Day Care Compared With Inpatient Management of Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy A Randomized Controlled Trial

Typeset version

 

TY  - JOUR
  - McCarthy, FP,Murphy, A,Khashan, AS,McElroy, B,Spillane, N,Marchocki, Z,Sarkar, R,Higgins, JR
  - 2014
  - October
  - Obstetrics ; Gynaecology
  - Day Care Compared With Inpatient Management of Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy A Randomized Controlled Trial
  - Validated
  - Altmetric: 6 ()
  - HYPEREMESIS GRAVIDARUM CONSORT STATEMENT WEIGHT
  - 124
  - 743
  - 748
  - OBJECTIVE: To examine day care treatment of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy compared with the traditional inpatient management of this condition.METHODS: We conducted an open-label, single-center, randomized controlled trial to examine the differences between day care and inpatient management of pregnant women with nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Primary outcome was total number of inpatient nights related to nausea and vomiting of pregnancy.RESULTS: Ninety-eight women were randomized to initial day care management (n=42) or inpatient management (n=56). Results are calculated from the time of randomization until resolution of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Women randomized to inpatient care experienced a median (interquartile range) of 2 (1-4) inpatient days compared with 0 (0-2) inpatient days for women randomized to day care (P<.001). Women randomized to initial treatment as an inpatient had significantly more median total number of inpatient admissions (one [1-2] compared with zero [0-1] admissions; P<.001) compared with women randomized to day care. No significant differences were observed in day care visits (median interquartile range] one [1-4] compared with two [1-4]; P=.30). Women randomized to inpatient care were as satisfied with their care as those randomized to day care (median [interquartile range]: 67 [57-69] compared with 63 [58-71] Client Satisfaction Questionnaire score; P=.7).CONCLUSION: Day care treatment of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy reduced hospital inpatient stay and was acceptable to patients.
  - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000449
DA  - 2014/10
ER  - 
@article{V279269233,
   = {McCarthy,  FP and Murphy,  A and Khashan,  AS and McElroy,  B and Spillane,  N and Marchocki,  Z and Sarkar,  R and Higgins,  JR },
   = {2014},
   = {October},
   = {Obstetrics ; Gynaecology},
   = {Day Care Compared With Inpatient Management of Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy A Randomized Controlled Trial},
   = {Validated},
   = {Altmetric: 6 ()},
   = {HYPEREMESIS GRAVIDARUM CONSORT STATEMENT WEIGHT},
   = {124},
  pages = {743--748},
   = {{OBJECTIVE: To examine day care treatment of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy compared with the traditional inpatient management of this condition.METHODS: We conducted an open-label, single-center, randomized controlled trial to examine the differences between day care and inpatient management of pregnant women with nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Primary outcome was total number of inpatient nights related to nausea and vomiting of pregnancy.RESULTS: Ninety-eight women were randomized to initial day care management (n=42) or inpatient management (n=56). Results are calculated from the time of randomization until resolution of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Women randomized to inpatient care experienced a median (interquartile range) of 2 (1-4) inpatient days compared with 0 (0-2) inpatient days for women randomized to day care (P<.001). Women randomized to initial treatment as an inpatient had significantly more median total number of inpatient admissions (one [1-2] compared with zero [0-1] admissions; P<.001) compared with women randomized to day care. No significant differences were observed in day care visits (median interquartile range] one [1-4] compared with two [1-4]; P=.30). Women randomized to inpatient care were as satisfied with their care as those randomized to day care (median [interquartile range]: 67 [57-69] compared with 63 [58-71] Client Satisfaction Questionnaire score; P=.7).CONCLUSION: Day care treatment of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy reduced hospital inpatient stay and was acceptable to patients.}},
   = {10.1097/AOG.0000000000000449},
  source = {IRIS}
}
AUTHORSMcCarthy, FP,Murphy, A,Khashan, AS,McElroy, B,Spillane, N,Marchocki, Z,Sarkar, R,Higgins, JR
YEAR2014
MONTHOctober
JOURNAL_CODEObstetrics ; Gynaecology
TITLEDay Care Compared With Inpatient Management of Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy A Randomized Controlled Trial
STATUSValidated
TIMES_CITEDAltmetric: 6 ()
SEARCH_KEYWORDHYPEREMESIS GRAVIDARUM CONSORT STATEMENT WEIGHT
VOLUME124
ISSUE
START_PAGE743
END_PAGE748
ABSTRACTOBJECTIVE: To examine day care treatment of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy compared with the traditional inpatient management of this condition.METHODS: We conducted an open-label, single-center, randomized controlled trial to examine the differences between day care and inpatient management of pregnant women with nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Primary outcome was total number of inpatient nights related to nausea and vomiting of pregnancy.RESULTS: Ninety-eight women were randomized to initial day care management (n=42) or inpatient management (n=56). Results are calculated from the time of randomization until resolution of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Women randomized to inpatient care experienced a median (interquartile range) of 2 (1-4) inpatient days compared with 0 (0-2) inpatient days for women randomized to day care (P<.001). Women randomized to initial treatment as an inpatient had significantly more median total number of inpatient admissions (one [1-2] compared with zero [0-1] admissions; P<.001) compared with women randomized to day care. No significant differences were observed in day care visits (median interquartile range] one [1-4] compared with two [1-4]; P=.30). Women randomized to inpatient care were as satisfied with their care as those randomized to day care (median [interquartile range]: 67 [57-69] compared with 63 [58-71] Client Satisfaction Questionnaire score; P=.7).CONCLUSION: Day care treatment of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy reduced hospital inpatient stay and was acceptable to patients.
PUBLISHER_LOCATION
ISBN_ISSN
EDITION
URL
DOI_LINK10.1097/AOG.0000000000000449
FUNDING_BODY
GRANT_DETAILS