Prevalence of Diabetes in the Republic of Ireland: Results from the National Health Survey (SLAN) 2007

Typeset version

 

TY  - JOUR
  - Balanda, KP,Buckley, CM,Barron, SJ,Fahy, LE,Madden, JM,Harrington, JM,Perry, IJ,Kearney, PM
  - 2013
  - October
  - Plos One
  - Prevalence of Diabetes in the Republic of Ireland: Results from the National Health Survey (SLAN) 2007
  - Validated
  - Altmetric: 9 ()
  - GENERAL-PRACTICE HEMOGLOBIN DIAGNOSIS MELLITUS GLUCOSE
  - 8
  - Background: Current estimates of diabetes prevalence in the Republic of Ireland (RoI) are based on UK epidemiological studies. This study uses Irish data to describe the prevalence of doctor-diagnosed diabetes amongst all adults aged 18+ years and undiagnosed diabetes amongst those aged 45+ years.Methods: The survey of lifestyle attitudes and nutrition (SLAN) 2007 is based on a nationally representative sample of Irish adults aged 18+ years (n = 10,364). Self-reported doctor-diagnosed diabetes was recorded for respondents in the full sample. Diabetes medication use, measured height and weight, and non-fasting blood samples were variously recorded in sub-samples of younger (n = 967) and older (n = 1,207) respondents.Results: The prevalence of doctor-diagnosed diabetes amongst adults aged 18+ years was 3.5% (95% CI 3.1% 3.9%). After adjustment for other explanatory variables; the risk of self-reported doctor-diagnosed diabetes was significantly related to age (p < 0.0001), employment status (p = 0.0003) and obesity (p = 0.0003). Amongst adults aged 45+ years, the prevalence of doctor-diagnosed diabetes was 8.9% (95% CI 7.3% - 10.5%) and undiagnosed diabetes was 2.8% (95% CI 1.4% - 4.1%). This represented 31.2% of diabetes cases in this age group.Conclusion: Notwithstanding methodological differences, these prevalence estimates are consistent with those in the UK and France. However, the percentage of undiagnosed cases amongst adults aged 45+ years appears to be higher in the RoI. Increased efforts to improve early detection and population level interventions to address adverse diet and lifestyle factors are urgently needed.
  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0078406
DA  - 2013/10
ER  - 
@article{V243942619,
   = {Balanda,  KP and Buckley,  CM and Barron,  SJ and Fahy,  LE and Madden,  JM and Harrington,  JM and Perry,  IJ and Kearney,  PM },
   = {2013},
   = {October},
   = {Plos One},
   = {Prevalence of Diabetes in the Republic of Ireland: Results from the National Health Survey (SLAN) 2007},
   = {Validated},
   = {Altmetric: 9 ()},
   = {GENERAL-PRACTICE HEMOGLOBIN DIAGNOSIS MELLITUS GLUCOSE},
   = {8},
   = {{Background: Current estimates of diabetes prevalence in the Republic of Ireland (RoI) are based on UK epidemiological studies. This study uses Irish data to describe the prevalence of doctor-diagnosed diabetes amongst all adults aged 18+ years and undiagnosed diabetes amongst those aged 45+ years.Methods: The survey of lifestyle attitudes and nutrition (SLAN) 2007 is based on a nationally representative sample of Irish adults aged 18+ years (n = 10,364). Self-reported doctor-diagnosed diabetes was recorded for respondents in the full sample. Diabetes medication use, measured height and weight, and non-fasting blood samples were variously recorded in sub-samples of younger (n = 967) and older (n = 1,207) respondents.Results: The prevalence of doctor-diagnosed diabetes amongst adults aged 18+ years was 3.5% (95% CI 3.1% 3.9%). After adjustment for other explanatory variables; the risk of self-reported doctor-diagnosed diabetes was significantly related to age (p < 0.0001), employment status (p = 0.0003) and obesity (p = 0.0003). Amongst adults aged 45+ years, the prevalence of doctor-diagnosed diabetes was 8.9% (95% CI 7.3% - 10.5%) and undiagnosed diabetes was 2.8% (95% CI 1.4% - 4.1%). This represented 31.2% of diabetes cases in this age group.Conclusion: Notwithstanding methodological differences, these prevalence estimates are consistent with those in the UK and France. However, the percentage of undiagnosed cases amongst adults aged 45+ years appears to be higher in the RoI. Increased efforts to improve early detection and population level interventions to address adverse diet and lifestyle factors are urgently needed.}},
   = {10.1371/journal.pone.0078406},
  source = {IRIS}
}
AUTHORSBalanda, KP,Buckley, CM,Barron, SJ,Fahy, LE,Madden, JM,Harrington, JM,Perry, IJ,Kearney, PM
YEAR2013
MONTHOctober
JOURNAL_CODEPlos One
TITLEPrevalence of Diabetes in the Republic of Ireland: Results from the National Health Survey (SLAN) 2007
STATUSValidated
TIMES_CITEDAltmetric: 9 ()
SEARCH_KEYWORDGENERAL-PRACTICE HEMOGLOBIN DIAGNOSIS MELLITUS GLUCOSE
VOLUME8
ISSUE
START_PAGE
END_PAGE
ABSTRACTBackground: Current estimates of diabetes prevalence in the Republic of Ireland (RoI) are based on UK epidemiological studies. This study uses Irish data to describe the prevalence of doctor-diagnosed diabetes amongst all adults aged 18+ years and undiagnosed diabetes amongst those aged 45+ years.Methods: The survey of lifestyle attitudes and nutrition (SLAN) 2007 is based on a nationally representative sample of Irish adults aged 18+ years (n = 10,364). Self-reported doctor-diagnosed diabetes was recorded for respondents in the full sample. Diabetes medication use, measured height and weight, and non-fasting blood samples were variously recorded in sub-samples of younger (n = 967) and older (n = 1,207) respondents.Results: The prevalence of doctor-diagnosed diabetes amongst adults aged 18+ years was 3.5% (95% CI 3.1% 3.9%). After adjustment for other explanatory variables; the risk of self-reported doctor-diagnosed diabetes was significantly related to age (p < 0.0001), employment status (p = 0.0003) and obesity (p = 0.0003). Amongst adults aged 45+ years, the prevalence of doctor-diagnosed diabetes was 8.9% (95% CI 7.3% - 10.5%) and undiagnosed diabetes was 2.8% (95% CI 1.4% - 4.1%). This represented 31.2% of diabetes cases in this age group.Conclusion: Notwithstanding methodological differences, these prevalence estimates are consistent with those in the UK and France. However, the percentage of undiagnosed cases amongst adults aged 45+ years appears to be higher in the RoI. Increased efforts to improve early detection and population level interventions to address adverse diet and lifestyle factors are urgently needed.
PUBLISHER_LOCATION
ISBN_ISSN
EDITION
URL
DOI_LINK10.1371/journal.pone.0078406
FUNDING_BODY
GRANT_DETAILS