The prevalence of coeliac disease among female subjects having bone densitometry

Typeset version

 

TY  - JOUR
  - O'Leary, C.,Feighery, C.,Feighery, A.,Quane, K.,Shanahan, F.,Molloy, M.,Cronin, C. C.
  - 2002
  - September
  - Irish Journal Of Medical Scienceirish Journal Of Medical Science
  - The prevalence of coeliac disease among female subjects having bone densitometry
  - Validated
  - ()
  - 171
  - 3
  - 145
  - 147
  - Background Osteoporosis frequently complicates coeliac disease but most studies focus on symptomatic patients at the time of diagnosis. Screening tests have revealed that many individuals with coeliac disease have mild, atypical, or absent symptoms. Aim To evaluate the relationship between coeliac disease and osteopenia or osteoporosis in female subjects attending for bone densitometry. Methods. We studied 371 female subjects attending for bone densitometry, without secondary causes of osteoporosis and included those with normal and with reduced bone mineral density. Mineral density was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Screening for coeliac disease was by measurement of anti-endomysial antibody by indirect immunofluorescence. Results Two of 115 (1.7%) female subjects with normal bone density and five of 256 (1.9%) female subjects with sub-normal bone density were positive for endomysial antibody. Five subjects who underwent small bowel biopsy had histological changes suggestive of coeliac disease. Conclusions In females referred for bone densitometry, endomysial antibody positivity was not more prevalent among those with reduced bone mineral density. Examining only patients with clinically detected coeliac disease may overestimate the frequency of complications. This study does not support population screening for coeliac disease in an area with a high frequency of the condition.Background Osteoporosis frequently complicates coeliac disease but most studies focus on symptomatic patients at the time of diagnosis. Screening tests have revealed that many individuals with coeliac disease have mild, atypical, or absent symptoms. Aim To evaluate the relationship between coeliac disease and osteopenia or osteoporosis in female subjects attending for bone densitometry. Methods. We studied 371 female subjects attending for bone densitometry, without secondary causes of osteoporosis and included those with normal and with reduced bone mineral density. Mineral density was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Screening for coeliac disease was by measurement of anti-endomysial antibody by indirect immunofluorescence. Results Two of 115 (1.7%) female subjects with normal bone density and five of 256 (1.9%) female subjects with sub-normal bone density were positive for endomysial antibody. Five subjects who underwent small bowel biopsy had histological changes suggestive of coeliac disease. Conclusions In females referred for bone densitometry, endomysial antibody positivity was not more prevalent among those with reduced bone mineral density. Examining only patients with clinically detected coeliac disease may overestimate the frequency of complications. This study does not support population screening for coeliac disease in an area with a high frequency of the condition.
  - 0021-12650021-1265
  - ://WOS:000179533400005://WOS:000179533400005
DA  - 2002/09
ER  - 
@article{V235379560,
   = {O'Leary,  C. and Feighery,  C. and Feighery,  A. and Quane,  K. and Shanahan,  F. and Molloy,  M. and Cronin,  C. C. },
   = {2002},
   = {September},
   = {Irish Journal Of Medical Scienceirish Journal Of Medical Science},
   = {The prevalence of coeliac disease among female subjects having bone densitometry},
   = {Validated},
   = {()},
   = {171},
   = {3},
  pages = {145--147},
   = {{Background Osteoporosis frequently complicates coeliac disease but most studies focus on symptomatic patients at the time of diagnosis. Screening tests have revealed that many individuals with coeliac disease have mild, atypical, or absent symptoms. Aim To evaluate the relationship between coeliac disease and osteopenia or osteoporosis in female subjects attending for bone densitometry. Methods. We studied 371 female subjects attending for bone densitometry, without secondary causes of osteoporosis and included those with normal and with reduced bone mineral density. Mineral density was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Screening for coeliac disease was by measurement of anti-endomysial antibody by indirect immunofluorescence. Results Two of 115 (1.7%) female subjects with normal bone density and five of 256 (1.9%) female subjects with sub-normal bone density were positive for endomysial antibody. Five subjects who underwent small bowel biopsy had histological changes suggestive of coeliac disease. Conclusions In females referred for bone densitometry, endomysial antibody positivity was not more prevalent among those with reduced bone mineral density. Examining only patients with clinically detected coeliac disease may overestimate the frequency of complications. This study does not support population screening for coeliac disease in an area with a high frequency of the condition.Background Osteoporosis frequently complicates coeliac disease but most studies focus on symptomatic patients at the time of diagnosis. Screening tests have revealed that many individuals with coeliac disease have mild, atypical, or absent symptoms. Aim To evaluate the relationship between coeliac disease and osteopenia or osteoporosis in female subjects attending for bone densitometry. Methods. We studied 371 female subjects attending for bone densitometry, without secondary causes of osteoporosis and included those with normal and with reduced bone mineral density. Mineral density was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Screening for coeliac disease was by measurement of anti-endomysial antibody by indirect immunofluorescence. Results Two of 115 (1.7%) female subjects with normal bone density and five of 256 (1.9%) female subjects with sub-normal bone density were positive for endomysial antibody. Five subjects who underwent small bowel biopsy had histological changes suggestive of coeliac disease. Conclusions In females referred for bone densitometry, endomysial antibody positivity was not more prevalent among those with reduced bone mineral density. Examining only patients with clinically detected coeliac disease may overestimate the frequency of complications. This study does not support population screening for coeliac disease in an area with a high frequency of the condition.}},
  issn = {0021-12650021-1265},
   = {://WOS:000179533400005://WOS:000179533400005},
  source = {IRIS}
}
AUTHORSO'Leary, C.,Feighery, C.,Feighery, A.,Quane, K.,Shanahan, F.,Molloy, M.,Cronin, C. C.
YEAR2002
MONTHSeptember
JOURNAL_CODEIrish Journal Of Medical Scienceirish Journal Of Medical Science
TITLEThe prevalence of coeliac disease among female subjects having bone densitometry
STATUSValidated
TIMES_CITED()
SEARCH_KEYWORD
VOLUME171
ISSUE3
START_PAGE145
END_PAGE147
ABSTRACTBackground Osteoporosis frequently complicates coeliac disease but most studies focus on symptomatic patients at the time of diagnosis. Screening tests have revealed that many individuals with coeliac disease have mild, atypical, or absent symptoms. Aim To evaluate the relationship between coeliac disease and osteopenia or osteoporosis in female subjects attending for bone densitometry. Methods. We studied 371 female subjects attending for bone densitometry, without secondary causes of osteoporosis and included those with normal and with reduced bone mineral density. Mineral density was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Screening for coeliac disease was by measurement of anti-endomysial antibody by indirect immunofluorescence. Results Two of 115 (1.7%) female subjects with normal bone density and five of 256 (1.9%) female subjects with sub-normal bone density were positive for endomysial antibody. Five subjects who underwent small bowel biopsy had histological changes suggestive of coeliac disease. Conclusions In females referred for bone densitometry, endomysial antibody positivity was not more prevalent among those with reduced bone mineral density. Examining only patients with clinically detected coeliac disease may overestimate the frequency of complications. This study does not support population screening for coeliac disease in an area with a high frequency of the condition.Background Osteoporosis frequently complicates coeliac disease but most studies focus on symptomatic patients at the time of diagnosis. Screening tests have revealed that many individuals with coeliac disease have mild, atypical, or absent symptoms. Aim To evaluate the relationship between coeliac disease and osteopenia or osteoporosis in female subjects attending for bone densitometry. Methods. We studied 371 female subjects attending for bone densitometry, without secondary causes of osteoporosis and included those with normal and with reduced bone mineral density. Mineral density was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Screening for coeliac disease was by measurement of anti-endomysial antibody by indirect immunofluorescence. Results Two of 115 (1.7%) female subjects with normal bone density and five of 256 (1.9%) female subjects with sub-normal bone density were positive for endomysial antibody. Five subjects who underwent small bowel biopsy had histological changes suggestive of coeliac disease. Conclusions In females referred for bone densitometry, endomysial antibody positivity was not more prevalent among those with reduced bone mineral density. Examining only patients with clinically detected coeliac disease may overestimate the frequency of complications. This study does not support population screening for coeliac disease in an area with a high frequency of the condition.
PUBLISHER_LOCATION
ISBN_ISSN0021-12650021-1265
EDITION
URL://WOS:000179533400005://WOS:000179533400005
DOI_LINK
FUNDING_BODY
GRANT_DETAILS