Neonatal seizures and their treatment

Typeset version

 

TY  - JOUR
  - Rennie, JM,Boylan, GB
  - 2003
  - March
  - Current Opinion In Neurology
  - Neonatal seizures and their treatment
  - Validated
  - ()
  - antiepileptic treatment electroencephalography neonatal seizures prognosis video-electroencephalographic telemetry TERM NEWBORN-INFANTS PERINATAL ASPHYXIA BRAIN-INJURY EEG ENCEPHALOPATHY LIDOCAINE EPILEPSY COUNTY
  - 16
  - 177
  - 181
  - Purpose of reviewNeonatal seizures continue to present a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to paediatricians worldwide, and are a worrying sign for both parents and clinicians alike. The present review summarizes recent evidence regarding the diagnosis, aetiology and treatment of neonatal seizures. It is timely because there is new evidence that seizures are damaging to the neonatal brain, and because prolonged electroencephalographic recordings during treatment have provided information that challenges established treatment regimens.Recent findingsNeonatal seizures can permanently disrupt neuronal development, induce synaptic reorganization, alter plasticity and 'prime' the brain to increased damage from seizures later in life. Phenobarbitone remains the mainstay of treatment and is effective in about one-third of cases; babies who respond tend to have a smaller seizure burden and a relatively normal background electroencephalogram. Their prognosis is better than in those who require second-line treatments. Phenytoin and lignocaine (membrane stabilizing drugs) are probably more effective than any of the benzodiazepines as second line, but very few evaluation studies have been reported. Babies who require second-line treatments are more likely to have hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, an abnormal background electroencephalogram and a large seizure burden, and have a worse prognosis than do those who respond to a single agent; most have significant disability at follow up.SummaryThe search for an effective antiepileptic regimen in the newborn must continue. Whether better control of neonatal seizures leads to a reduction in neurodisability in childhood cannot be determined until more effective treatments are found. Meanwhile, electroencephalography remains the most useful investigation for diagnosis and prognosis.
  - DOI 10.1097/01.wco.0000063768.15877.23
DA  - 2003/03
ER  - 
@article{V160755960,
   = {Rennie,  JM and Boylan,  GB },
   = {2003},
   = {March},
   = {Current Opinion In Neurology},
   = {Neonatal seizures and their treatment},
   = {Validated},
   = {()},
   = {antiepileptic treatment electroencephalography neonatal seizures prognosis video-electroencephalographic telemetry TERM NEWBORN-INFANTS PERINATAL ASPHYXIA BRAIN-INJURY EEG ENCEPHALOPATHY LIDOCAINE EPILEPSY COUNTY},
   = {16},
  pages = {177--181},
   = {{Purpose of reviewNeonatal seizures continue to present a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to paediatricians worldwide, and are a worrying sign for both parents and clinicians alike. The present review summarizes recent evidence regarding the diagnosis, aetiology and treatment of neonatal seizures. It is timely because there is new evidence that seizures are damaging to the neonatal brain, and because prolonged electroencephalographic recordings during treatment have provided information that challenges established treatment regimens.Recent findingsNeonatal seizures can permanently disrupt neuronal development, induce synaptic reorganization, alter plasticity and 'prime' the brain to increased damage from seizures later in life. Phenobarbitone remains the mainstay of treatment and is effective in about one-third of cases; babies who respond tend to have a smaller seizure burden and a relatively normal background electroencephalogram. Their prognosis is better than in those who require second-line treatments. Phenytoin and lignocaine (membrane stabilizing drugs) are probably more effective than any of the benzodiazepines as second line, but very few evaluation studies have been reported. Babies who require second-line treatments are more likely to have hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, an abnormal background electroencephalogram and a large seizure burden, and have a worse prognosis than do those who respond to a single agent; most have significant disability at follow up.SummaryThe search for an effective antiepileptic regimen in the newborn must continue. Whether better control of neonatal seizures leads to a reduction in neurodisability in childhood cannot be determined until more effective treatments are found. Meanwhile, electroencephalography remains the most useful investigation for diagnosis and prognosis.}},
   = {DOI 10.1097/01.wco.0000063768.15877.23},
  source = {IRIS}
}
AUTHORSRennie, JM,Boylan, GB
YEAR2003
MONTHMarch
JOURNAL_CODECurrent Opinion In Neurology
TITLENeonatal seizures and their treatment
STATUSValidated
TIMES_CITED()
SEARCH_KEYWORDantiepileptic treatment electroencephalography neonatal seizures prognosis video-electroencephalographic telemetry TERM NEWBORN-INFANTS PERINATAL ASPHYXIA BRAIN-INJURY EEG ENCEPHALOPATHY LIDOCAINE EPILEPSY COUNTY
VOLUME16
ISSUE
START_PAGE177
END_PAGE181
ABSTRACTPurpose of reviewNeonatal seizures continue to present a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to paediatricians worldwide, and are a worrying sign for both parents and clinicians alike. The present review summarizes recent evidence regarding the diagnosis, aetiology and treatment of neonatal seizures. It is timely because there is new evidence that seizures are damaging to the neonatal brain, and because prolonged electroencephalographic recordings during treatment have provided information that challenges established treatment regimens.Recent findingsNeonatal seizures can permanently disrupt neuronal development, induce synaptic reorganization, alter plasticity and 'prime' the brain to increased damage from seizures later in life. Phenobarbitone remains the mainstay of treatment and is effective in about one-third of cases; babies who respond tend to have a smaller seizure burden and a relatively normal background electroencephalogram. Their prognosis is better than in those who require second-line treatments. Phenytoin and lignocaine (membrane stabilizing drugs) are probably more effective than any of the benzodiazepines as second line, but very few evaluation studies have been reported. Babies who require second-line treatments are more likely to have hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, an abnormal background electroencephalogram and a large seizure burden, and have a worse prognosis than do those who respond to a single agent; most have significant disability at follow up.SummaryThe search for an effective antiepileptic regimen in the newborn must continue. Whether better control of neonatal seizures leads to a reduction in neurodisability in childhood cannot be determined until more effective treatments are found. Meanwhile, electroencephalography remains the most useful investigation for diagnosis and prognosis.
PUBLISHER_LOCATION
ISBN_ISSN
EDITION
URL
DOI_LINKDOI 10.1097/01.wco.0000063768.15877.23
FUNDING_BODY
GRANT_DETAILS