Cost effectiveness of tooth replacement strategies for partially dentate elders

Typeset version

 

TY  - CONF
  - G. McKenna, N. Woods, PF. Allen, D. O¿Mahony, M. Cronin, C. Normand.
  - 89th General Session and Exhibition of the International Association for Dental Research
  - Cost effectiveness of tooth replacement strategies for partially dentate elders
  - 2011
  - March
  - Validated
  - 1
  - ()
  - San Diego Convention Center, San Diego, California, USA.
  - 16-MAR-11
  - 19-MAR-11
  - Objectives:  This study aimed to compare the cost effectiveness of conventional treatment using partial dentures with functionally orientated treatment based on the shortened dental arch concept to replace missing teeth for partially dentate elders.     Methods:  50 partially dentate patients aged 65 years and older were recruited following routine dental assessment at a university dental hospital.  Patients consented to and were randomly assigned to the two treatment arms.  The conventional treatment group received a removable partial denture to replace all missing natural teeth.  The functionally orientated group were restored to a shortened dental arch of 10 occluding contacts using resin bonded bridgework to replace missing incisors, canines and premolars.  The costs associated with each treatment were recorded including laboratory charges, treatment time and opportunity costs.   The impact on quality of life (OHRQoL) was measured using the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile.    Results:  Both groups reported improvements in OHRQoL after completion of treatment.  For the conventional group, the mean OHIP-14 score decreased from 12.4 pre-operatively to 3.3 post-operatively (p<0.001).  In the functionally orientated group the OHIP-14 score decreased from 11.4 to 1.8 following treatment (p<0.001).  On average the conventional treatment group required 8.3 clinic visits as compared to 4.4 visits for the functionally orientated group.  The mean total treatment time was 183 minutes 19 seconds for the conventional group versus 124 minutes 8 seconds for the functionally orientated group.  The conventional treatment group had an average of 6.33 teeth replaced at a laboratory cost of £287.08.  The functionally orientated group had an average of 2.64 teeth replaced at a laboratory cost of £207.66.    Conclusions:  Restoration to a shortened dental arch using functionally orientated treatment resulted in a similar improvement in OHRQoL with fewer clinic visits, less operative time and at a lower laboratory cost compared with conventional treatment.    
  - Irish Health Research Board
DA  - 2011/03
ER  - 
@inproceedings{V71178531,
   = {G. McKenna,  N. Woods and  PF. Allen,  D. O¿Mahony and  M. Cronin,  C. Normand. },
   = {89th General Session and Exhibition of the International Association for Dental Research},
   = {{Cost effectiveness of tooth replacement strategies for partially dentate elders}},
   = {2011},
   = {March},
   = {Validated},
   = {1},
   = {()},
   = {San Diego Convention Center, San Diego, California, USA.},
  month = {Mar},
   = {19-MAR-11},
   = {{Objectives:  This study aimed to compare the cost effectiveness of conventional treatment using partial dentures with functionally orientated treatment based on the shortened dental arch concept to replace missing teeth for partially dentate elders.     Methods:  50 partially dentate patients aged 65 years and older were recruited following routine dental assessment at a university dental hospital.  Patients consented to and were randomly assigned to the two treatment arms.  The conventional treatment group received a removable partial denture to replace all missing natural teeth.  The functionally orientated group were restored to a shortened dental arch of 10 occluding contacts using resin bonded bridgework to replace missing incisors, canines and premolars.  The costs associated with each treatment were recorded including laboratory charges, treatment time and opportunity costs.   The impact on quality of life (OHRQoL) was measured using the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile.    Results:  Both groups reported improvements in OHRQoL after completion of treatment.  For the conventional group, the mean OHIP-14 score decreased from 12.4 pre-operatively to 3.3 post-operatively (p<0.001).  In the functionally orientated group the OHIP-14 score decreased from 11.4 to 1.8 following treatment (p<0.001).  On average the conventional treatment group required 8.3 clinic visits as compared to 4.4 visits for the functionally orientated group.  The mean total treatment time was 183 minutes 19 seconds for the conventional group versus 124 minutes 8 seconds for the functionally orientated group.  The conventional treatment group had an average of 6.33 teeth replaced at a laboratory cost of £287.08.  The functionally orientated group had an average of 2.64 teeth replaced at a laboratory cost of £207.66.    Conclusions:  Restoration to a shortened dental arch using functionally orientated treatment resulted in a similar improvement in OHRQoL with fewer clinic visits, less operative time and at a lower laboratory cost compared with conventional treatment.    }},
   = {Irish Health Research Board},
  source = {IRIS}
}
AUTHORSG. McKenna, N. Woods, PF. Allen, D. O¿Mahony, M. Cronin, C. Normand.
TITLE89th General Session and Exhibition of the International Association for Dental Research
PUBLICATION_NAMECost effectiveness of tooth replacement strategies for partially dentate elders
YEAR2011
MONTHMarch
STATUSValidated
PEER_REVIEW1
TIMES_CITED()
SEARCH_KEYWORD
EDITORS
START_PAGE
END_PAGE
LOCATIONSan Diego Convention Center, San Diego, California, USA.
START_DATE16-MAR-11
END_DATE19-MAR-11
ABSTRACTObjectives:  This study aimed to compare the cost effectiveness of conventional treatment using partial dentures with functionally orientated treatment based on the shortened dental arch concept to replace missing teeth for partially dentate elders.     Methods:  50 partially dentate patients aged 65 years and older were recruited following routine dental assessment at a university dental hospital.  Patients consented to and were randomly assigned to the two treatment arms.  The conventional treatment group received a removable partial denture to replace all missing natural teeth.  The functionally orientated group were restored to a shortened dental arch of 10 occluding contacts using resin bonded bridgework to replace missing incisors, canines and premolars.  The costs associated with each treatment were recorded including laboratory charges, treatment time and opportunity costs.   The impact on quality of life (OHRQoL) was measured using the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile.    Results:  Both groups reported improvements in OHRQoL after completion of treatment.  For the conventional group, the mean OHIP-14 score decreased from 12.4 pre-operatively to 3.3 post-operatively (p<0.001).  In the functionally orientated group the OHIP-14 score decreased from 11.4 to 1.8 following treatment (p<0.001).  On average the conventional treatment group required 8.3 clinic visits as compared to 4.4 visits for the functionally orientated group.  The mean total treatment time was 183 minutes 19 seconds for the conventional group versus 124 minutes 8 seconds for the functionally orientated group.  The conventional treatment group had an average of 6.33 teeth replaced at a laboratory cost of £287.08.  The functionally orientated group had an average of 2.64 teeth replaced at a laboratory cost of £207.66.    Conclusions:  Restoration to a shortened dental arch using functionally orientated treatment resulted in a similar improvement in OHRQoL with fewer clinic visits, less operative time and at a lower laboratory cost compared with conventional treatment.    
FUNDED_BYIrish Health Research Board
URL
DOI_LINK
FUNDING_BODY
GRANT_DETAILS