Photoelastic stress analysis in perforated (Rochette) resin bonded bridge design.

Typeset version

 

TY  - JOUR
  - Ziada HM, Orr JF, Benington IC. 
  - 2000
  - May
  - Journal of Oral Rehabiliation
  - Photoelastic stress analysis in perforated (Rochette) resin bonded bridge design.
  - Validated
  - ()
  - 27
  - 5
  - 387
  - 393
  - Rochette described the perforated cast metal bonded design for splinting periodontally compromised teeth. The design was later used for replacing missing teeth. The main causes of failure of the perforated (Rochette) type design were attributed to inappropriate case selection and erosion of the composite from perforations. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of stress magnitude and direction on failure of perforated resin bonded bridges (RBBs). The objective was to compare stress magnitudes in this design with those reported on the non-perforated RBBs. Photoelastic modelling materials were selected to represent the relative stiffnesses of a posterior mandibular and an anterior maxillary perforated (Rochette) type design. The sizes of the models were scaled to x 2.5 in order to enhance visual analysis of the stress patterns. Stress magnitudes were quantified from isochromatic fringes and stress directions were evaluated from stress trajectories. These revealed a high-stress concentration around the perforations, particularly for those at the proximo-lingual/palatal (connector) areas. This experimental study revealed that the main reason for failure of Rochette designs is deformation at the perforations.
DA  - 2000/05
ER  - 
@article{V33732490,
   = {Ziada HM,  Orr JF and  Benington IC.  },
   = {2000},
   = {May},
   = {Journal of Oral Rehabiliation},
   = {Photoelastic stress analysis in perforated (Rochette) resin bonded bridge design.},
   = {Validated},
   = {()},
   = {27},
   = {5},
  pages = {387--393},
   = {{Rochette described the perforated cast metal bonded design for splinting periodontally compromised teeth. The design was later used for replacing missing teeth. The main causes of failure of the perforated (Rochette) type design were attributed to inappropriate case selection and erosion of the composite from perforations. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of stress magnitude and direction on failure of perforated resin bonded bridges (RBBs). The objective was to compare stress magnitudes in this design with those reported on the non-perforated RBBs. Photoelastic modelling materials were selected to represent the relative stiffnesses of a posterior mandibular and an anterior maxillary perforated (Rochette) type design. The sizes of the models were scaled to x 2.5 in order to enhance visual analysis of the stress patterns. Stress magnitudes were quantified from isochromatic fringes and stress directions were evaluated from stress trajectories. These revealed a high-stress concentration around the perforations, particularly for those at the proximo-lingual/palatal (connector) areas. This experimental study revealed that the main reason for failure of Rochette designs is deformation at the perforations.}},
  source = {IRIS}
}
AUTHORSZiada HM, Orr JF, Benington IC.
YEAR2000
MONTHMay
JOURNAL_CODEJournal of Oral Rehabiliation
TITLEPhotoelastic stress analysis in perforated (Rochette) resin bonded bridge design.
STATUSValidated
TIMES_CITED()
SEARCH_KEYWORD
VOLUME27
ISSUE5
START_PAGE387
END_PAGE393
ABSTRACTRochette described the perforated cast metal bonded design for splinting periodontally compromised teeth. The design was later used for replacing missing teeth. The main causes of failure of the perforated (Rochette) type design were attributed to inappropriate case selection and erosion of the composite from perforations. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of stress magnitude and direction on failure of perforated resin bonded bridges (RBBs). The objective was to compare stress magnitudes in this design with those reported on the non-perforated RBBs. Photoelastic modelling materials were selected to represent the relative stiffnesses of a posterior mandibular and an anterior maxillary perforated (Rochette) type design. The sizes of the models were scaled to x 2.5 in order to enhance visual analysis of the stress patterns. Stress magnitudes were quantified from isochromatic fringes and stress directions were evaluated from stress trajectories. These revealed a high-stress concentration around the perforations, particularly for those at the proximo-lingual/palatal (connector) areas. This experimental study revealed that the main reason for failure of Rochette designs is deformation at the perforations.
PUBLISHER_LOCATION
ISBN_ISSN
EDITION
URL
DOI_LINK
FUNDING_BODY
GRANT_DETAILS