IRIS publication 279653028
A study of outcomes for primary teeth restored by intra-coronal restorations in a Dental Hospital in Ireland..
RIS format for Endnote and similar
TY - JOUR - Hurley E, Da Mata C, Stewart C, Kinirons M. - 2015 - March - European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry - A study of outcomes for primary teeth restored by intra-coronal restorations in a Dental Hospital in Ireland.. - Published - () - Keywords Dental caries, Restored, Primary, Deciduous teeth, Outcomes, Children - 16 - 1 - 78 - 82 - Aim To study the outcomes for restored primary molar teeth; to examine outcomes in relation to tooth type involved, intracoronal restoration complexity and to the material used. Materials and methods Design: Retrospective study of primary molar teeth restored by intracoronal restorations. A series of restored primary molar teeth for children aged 6-12 years was studied. The principal outcome measure was failure of initial restoration (re-restoration or extraction). Three hundred patient records were studied to include three equal groups of primary molar teeth restored with amalgam, composite or glass ionomer, respectively. Restorative materials, the restoration type, simple (single surface) or complex (multi-surface) restoration, and tooth notation were recorded. Subsequent interventions were examined. Data were coded and entered into a Microsoft Excel database and analysis undertaken using SPSS v.18. Statistical differences were tested using the c2 test of statistical significance. Results Of the 300 teeth studied, 61 restoration failures were recorded with 11 of those extracted. No significant differences were found between outcomes for upper first, upper second, lower first or lowersecond primary molars. Outcomes for simple primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations were significantly better than those for complex intracoronal restorations (P = 0.042). Teeth originally restored with amalgam accounted for 19.7% of the 61 failures, composite for 29.5%, while teeth restored with glass ionomer represented 50.8% of all restoration failures. The differences were significant (P = 0.012). Conclusions The majority (79.7%) of the 300 restored primary teeth studied were successful, and 3.7% teeth were extracted. Restorations involving more than one surface had almost twice the failure rate of single surface restorations. The difference was significant. Significant differences in failure rates for the three dental materials studied were recorded. Amalgam had the lowest failure rate while the failure rate with glass ionomer was the highest. DA - 2015/03 ER -
BIBTeX format for JabRef and similar
@article{V279653028, = {Hurley E, Da Mata C and Stewart C, Kinirons M. }, = {2015}, = {March}, = {European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry}, = {A study of outcomes for primary teeth restored by intra-coronal restorations in a Dental Hospital in Ireland..}, = {Published}, = {()}, = {Keywords Dental caries, Restored, Primary, Deciduous teeth, Outcomes, Children}, = {16}, = {1}, pages = {78--82}, = {{Aim To study the outcomes for restored primary molar teeth; to examine outcomes in relation to tooth type involved, intracoronal restoration complexity and to the material used. Materials and methods Design: Retrospective study of primary molar teeth restored by intracoronal restorations. A series of restored primary molar teeth for children aged 6-12 years was studied. The principal outcome measure was failure of initial restoration (re-restoration or extraction). Three hundred patient records were studied to include three equal groups of primary molar teeth restored with amalgam, composite or glass ionomer, respectively. Restorative materials, the restoration type, simple (single surface) or complex (multi-surface) restoration, and tooth notation were recorded. Subsequent interventions were examined. Data were coded and entered into a Microsoft Excel database and analysis undertaken using SPSS v.18. Statistical differences were tested using the c2 test of statistical significance. Results Of the 300 teeth studied, 61 restoration failures were recorded with 11 of those extracted. No significant differences were found between outcomes for upper first, upper second, lower first or lowersecond primary molars. Outcomes for simple primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations were significantly better than those for complex intracoronal restorations (P = 0.042). Teeth originally restored with amalgam accounted for 19.7% of the 61 failures, composite for 29.5%, while teeth restored with glass ionomer represented 50.8% of all restoration failures. The differences were significant (P = 0.012). Conclusions The majority (79.7%) of the 300 restored primary teeth studied were successful, and 3.7% teeth were extracted. Restorations involving more than one surface had almost twice the failure rate of single surface restorations. The difference was significant. Significant differences in failure rates for the three dental materials studied were recorded. Amalgam had the lowest failure rate while the failure rate with glass ionomer was the highest.}}, source = {IRIS} }
Data as stored in IRIS
AUTHORS | Hurley E, Da Mata C, Stewart C, Kinirons M. | ||
YEAR | 2015 | ||
MONTH | March | ||
JOURNAL_CODE | European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry | ||
TITLE | A study of outcomes for primary teeth restored by intra-coronal restorations in a Dental Hospital in Ireland.. | ||
STATUS | Published | ||
TIMES_CITED | () | ||
SEARCH_KEYWORD | Keywords Dental caries, Restored, Primary, Deciduous teeth, Outcomes, Children | ||
VOLUME | 16 | ||
ISSUE | 1 | ||
START_PAGE | 78 | ||
END_PAGE | 82 | ||
ABSTRACT | Aim To study the outcomes for restored primary molar teeth; to examine outcomes in relation to tooth type involved, intracoronal restoration complexity and to the material used. Materials and methods Design: Retrospective study of primary molar teeth restored by intracoronal restorations. A series of restored primary molar teeth for children aged 6-12 years was studied. The principal outcome measure was failure of initial restoration (re-restoration or extraction). Three hundred patient records were studied to include three equal groups of primary molar teeth restored with amalgam, composite or glass ionomer, respectively. Restorative materials, the restoration type, simple (single surface) or complex (multi-surface) restoration, and tooth notation were recorded. Subsequent interventions were examined. Data were coded and entered into a Microsoft Excel database and analysis undertaken using SPSS v.18. Statistical differences were tested using the c2 test of statistical significance. Results Of the 300 teeth studied, 61 restoration failures were recorded with 11 of those extracted. No significant differences were found between outcomes for upper first, upper second, lower first or lowersecond primary molars. Outcomes for simple primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations were significantly better than those for complex intracoronal restorations (P = 0.042). Teeth originally restored with amalgam accounted for 19.7% of the 61 failures, composite for 29.5%, while teeth restored with glass ionomer represented 50.8% of all restoration failures. The differences were significant (P = 0.012). Conclusions The majority (79.7%) of the 300 restored primary teeth studied were successful, and 3.7% teeth were extracted. Restorations involving more than one surface had almost twice the failure rate of single surface restorations. The difference was significant. Significant differences in failure rates for the three dental materials studied were recorded. Amalgam had the lowest failure rate while the failure rate with glass ionomer was the highest. | ||
PUBLISHER_LOCATION | |||
ISBN_ISSN | |||
EDITION | |||
URL | |||
DOI_LINK | |||
FUNDING_BODY | |||
GRANT_DETAILS |