Intercomparison of measurements of NO2 concentrations in the atmosphere simulation chamber SAPHIR during the NO3Comp campaign

Typeset version

 

TY  - JOUR
  - Fuchs, H,Ball, SM,Bohn, B,Brauers, T,Cohen, RC,Dorn, HP,Dube, WP,Fry, JL,Haseler, R,Heitmann, U,Jones, RL,Kleffmann, J,Mentel, TF,Musgen, P,Rohrer, F,Rollins, AW,Ruth, AA,Kiendler-Scharr, A,Schlosser, E,Shillings, AJL,Tillmann, R,Varma, RM,Venables, DS,Tapia, GV,Wahner, A,Wegener, R,Wooldridge, PJ,Brown, SS
  - 2010
  - January
  - Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  - Intercomparison of measurements of NO2 concentrations in the atmosphere simulation chamber SAPHIR during the NO3Comp campaign
  - Validated
  - Altmetric: 1 ()
  - CAVITY-ENHANCED ABSORPTION RING-DOWN SPECTROSCOPY INDUCED FLUORESCENCE INSTRUMENT IN-SITU MEASUREMENTS CROSS-SECTIONS DIODE-LASER NITROGEN-DIOXIDE HIGH-SENSITIVITY MIXING RATIOS TRACE GASES
  - 3
  - 21
  - 37
  - NO2 concentrations were measured by various instruments during the NO3Comp campaign at the atmosphere simulation chamber SAPHIR at Forschungszentrum Julich, Germany, in June 2007. Analytical methods included photolytic conversion with chemiluminescence (PC-CLD), broadband cavity ring-down spectroscopy (BBCRDS), pulsed cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS), incoherent broadband cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy (IBBCEAS), and laser-induced fluorescence (LIF). All broadband absorption spectrometers were optimized for the detection of the main target species of the campaign, NO3, but were also capable of detecting NO2 simultaneously with reduced sensitivity. NO2 mixing ratios in the chamber were within a range characteristic of polluted, urban conditions, with a maximum mixing ratio of approximately 75 ppbv. The overall agreement between measurements of all instruments was excellent. Linear fits of the combined data sets resulted in slopes that differ from unity only within the stated uncertainty of each instrument. Possible interferences from species such as water vapor and ozone were negligible under the experimental conditions.
  - http://hdl.handle.net/10468/725
  - 10.5194/amt-3-21-2010
DA  - 2010/01
ER  - 
@article{V43334259,
   = {Fuchs,  H and Ball,  SM and Bohn,  B and Brauers,  T and Cohen,  RC and Dorn,  HP and Dube,  WP and Fry,  JL and Haseler,  R and Heitmann,  U and Jones,  RL and Kleffmann,  J and Mentel,  TF and Musgen,  P and Rohrer,  F and Rollins,  AW and Ruth,  AA and Kiendler-Scharr,  A and Schlosser,  E and Shillings,  AJL and Tillmann,  R and Varma,  RM and Venables,  DS and Tapia,  GV and Wahner,  A and Wegener,  R and Wooldridge,  PJ and Brown,  SS },
   = {2010},
   = {January},
   = {Atmospheric Measurement Techniques},
   = {Intercomparison of measurements of NO2 concentrations in the atmosphere simulation chamber SAPHIR during the NO3Comp campaign},
   = {Validated},
   = {Altmetric: 1 ()},
   = {CAVITY-ENHANCED ABSORPTION RING-DOWN SPECTROSCOPY INDUCED FLUORESCENCE INSTRUMENT IN-SITU MEASUREMENTS CROSS-SECTIONS DIODE-LASER NITROGEN-DIOXIDE HIGH-SENSITIVITY MIXING RATIOS TRACE GASES},
   = {3},
  pages = {21--37},
   = {{NO2 concentrations were measured by various instruments during the NO3Comp campaign at the atmosphere simulation chamber SAPHIR at Forschungszentrum Julich, Germany, in June 2007. Analytical methods included photolytic conversion with chemiluminescence (PC-CLD), broadband cavity ring-down spectroscopy (BBCRDS), pulsed cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS), incoherent broadband cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy (IBBCEAS), and laser-induced fluorescence (LIF). All broadband absorption spectrometers were optimized for the detection of the main target species of the campaign, NO3, but were also capable of detecting NO2 simultaneously with reduced sensitivity. NO2 mixing ratios in the chamber were within a range characteristic of polluted, urban conditions, with a maximum mixing ratio of approximately 75 ppbv. The overall agreement between measurements of all instruments was excellent. Linear fits of the combined data sets resulted in slopes that differ from unity only within the stated uncertainty of each instrument. Possible interferences from species such as water vapor and ozone were negligible under the experimental conditions.}},
   = {http://hdl.handle.net/10468/725},
   = {10.5194/amt-3-21-2010},
  source = {IRIS}
}
AUTHORSFuchs, H,Ball, SM,Bohn, B,Brauers, T,Cohen, RC,Dorn, HP,Dube, WP,Fry, JL,Haseler, R,Heitmann, U,Jones, RL,Kleffmann, J,Mentel, TF,Musgen, P,Rohrer, F,Rollins, AW,Ruth, AA,Kiendler-Scharr, A,Schlosser, E,Shillings, AJL,Tillmann, R,Varma, RM,Venables, DS,Tapia, GV,Wahner, A,Wegener, R,Wooldridge, PJ,Brown, SS
YEAR2010
MONTHJanuary
JOURNAL_CODEAtmospheric Measurement Techniques
TITLEIntercomparison of measurements of NO2 concentrations in the atmosphere simulation chamber SAPHIR during the NO3Comp campaign
STATUSValidated
TIMES_CITEDAltmetric: 1 ()
SEARCH_KEYWORDCAVITY-ENHANCED ABSORPTION RING-DOWN SPECTROSCOPY INDUCED FLUORESCENCE INSTRUMENT IN-SITU MEASUREMENTS CROSS-SECTIONS DIODE-LASER NITROGEN-DIOXIDE HIGH-SENSITIVITY MIXING RATIOS TRACE GASES
VOLUME3
ISSUE
START_PAGE21
END_PAGE37
ABSTRACTNO2 concentrations were measured by various instruments during the NO3Comp campaign at the atmosphere simulation chamber SAPHIR at Forschungszentrum Julich, Germany, in June 2007. Analytical methods included photolytic conversion with chemiluminescence (PC-CLD), broadband cavity ring-down spectroscopy (BBCRDS), pulsed cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS), incoherent broadband cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy (IBBCEAS), and laser-induced fluorescence (LIF). All broadband absorption spectrometers were optimized for the detection of the main target species of the campaign, NO3, but were also capable of detecting NO2 simultaneously with reduced sensitivity. NO2 mixing ratios in the chamber were within a range characteristic of polluted, urban conditions, with a maximum mixing ratio of approximately 75 ppbv. The overall agreement between measurements of all instruments was excellent. Linear fits of the combined data sets resulted in slopes that differ from unity only within the stated uncertainty of each instrument. Possible interferences from species such as water vapor and ozone were negligible under the experimental conditions.
PUBLISHER_LOCATION
ISBN_ISSN
EDITION
URLhttp://hdl.handle.net/10468/725
DOI_LINK10.5194/amt-3-21-2010
FUNDING_BODY
GRANT_DETAILS