A Comparative Analysis of Structural Damage Detection Techniques by Wavelet, Kurtosis and Pseudofractal Methods

Typeset version

 

TY  - JOUR
  - Pakrashi V, O¿ Connor A and Basu B.
  - 2009
  - Unknown
  - Structural Engineering and Mechanics
  - A Comparative Analysis of Structural Damage Detection Techniques by Wavelet, Kurtosis and Pseudofractal Methods
  - Published
  - ()
  - 32
  - 4
  - 489
  - 500
  - The aim of this paper is to compare wavelet, kurtosis and pseudofractal based techniques forstructural health monitoring in the presence of measurement noise. A detailed comparison and assessment of these techniques have been carried out in this paper through numerical experiments for the calibration of damage extent of a simply supported beam with an open crack serving as an illustrative example. The numerical experiments are deemed critical due to limited amount of experimental data available in the field of singularity based detection of damage. A continuous detectibility map has been proposed for comparing various techniques qualitatively. Efficiency surfaces have been constructed for wavelet, kurtosis and pseudofractal based calibration of damage extent as a function of damage location and measurement noise level. Levels of noise have been identified for each technique where a sudden drop of calibration efficiency is observed marking the onset of damage masking regime by measurement noise.
  - 1225-4568,1598-6217
  - http://technopress.kaist.ac.kr/?page=container;journal=sem;volume=32;num=4
DA  - 2009/NaN
ER  - 
@article{V52679196,
   = {Pakrashi V, O¿ Connor A and Basu B.},
   = {2009},
   = {Unknown},
   = {Structural Engineering and Mechanics},
   = {A Comparative Analysis of Structural Damage Detection Techniques by Wavelet, Kurtosis and Pseudofractal Methods},
   = {Published},
   = {()},
   = {32},
   = {4},
  pages = {489--500},
   = {{The aim of this paper is to compare wavelet, kurtosis and pseudofractal based techniques forstructural health monitoring in the presence of measurement noise. A detailed comparison and assessment of these techniques have been carried out in this paper through numerical experiments for the calibration of damage extent of a simply supported beam with an open crack serving as an illustrative example. The numerical experiments are deemed critical due to limited amount of experimental data available in the field of singularity based detection of damage. A continuous detectibility map has been proposed for comparing various techniques qualitatively. Efficiency surfaces have been constructed for wavelet, kurtosis and pseudofractal based calibration of damage extent as a function of damage location and measurement noise level. Levels of noise have been identified for each technique where a sudden drop of calibration efficiency is observed marking the onset of damage masking regime by measurement noise.}},
  issn = {1225-4568,1598-6217},
   = {http://technopress.kaist.ac.kr/?page=container;journal=sem;volume=32;num=4},
  source = {IRIS}
}
AUTHORSPakrashi V, O¿ Connor A and Basu B.
YEAR2009
MONTHUnknown
JOURNAL_CODEStructural Engineering and Mechanics
TITLEA Comparative Analysis of Structural Damage Detection Techniques by Wavelet, Kurtosis and Pseudofractal Methods
STATUSPublished
TIMES_CITED()
SEARCH_KEYWORD
VOLUME32
ISSUE4
START_PAGE489
END_PAGE500
ABSTRACTThe aim of this paper is to compare wavelet, kurtosis and pseudofractal based techniques forstructural health monitoring in the presence of measurement noise. A detailed comparison and assessment of these techniques have been carried out in this paper through numerical experiments for the calibration of damage extent of a simply supported beam with an open crack serving as an illustrative example. The numerical experiments are deemed critical due to limited amount of experimental data available in the field of singularity based detection of damage. A continuous detectibility map has been proposed for comparing various techniques qualitatively. Efficiency surfaces have been constructed for wavelet, kurtosis and pseudofractal based calibration of damage extent as a function of damage location and measurement noise level. Levels of noise have been identified for each technique where a sudden drop of calibration efficiency is observed marking the onset of damage masking regime by measurement noise.
PUBLISHER_LOCATION
ISBN_ISSN1225-4568,1598-6217
EDITION
URLhttp://technopress.kaist.ac.kr/?page=container;journal=sem;volume=32;num=4
DOI_LINK
FUNDING_BODY
GRANT_DETAILS