TY - JOUR
T1 - A camera-trap assessment of the native and invasive mammals present in protected areas of Magallanes, Chilean Patagonia
AU - Silva-Rodríguez, Eduardo A.
AU - Cortés, Esteban I.
AU - Álvarez, Ximena
AU - Cabeza, Diego
AU - Cáceres, Benjamín
AU - Cariñanos, Aintzane
AU - Crego, Ramiro D.
AU - Cisternas, Gonzalo
AU - Fernández, Roberto
AU - Godoy, Claudia
AU - González, Jorge
AU - Ivanovich-Hichins, Rodrigo
AU - Jara-Díaz, Javiera
AU - Jiménez-Torres, Marina
AU - Lopetegui, Miguel
AU - Martínez, Marcelo
AU - Matamala, Olivia
AU - Ojeda, Francisco
AU - Paredes, Fredy
AU - Rodríguez, Rodrigo
AU - Sandoval, Jorge
AU - Schüttler, Elke
AU - Ulloa-Vera, Carla
AU - Valencia, Catalina
AU - Valencia-Cárdenas, Marcelo
AU - Vásquez-Ibarra, Viviana
AU - Videla, Francisco
AU - Vilaboa, Andrés
AU - Zlatar, Andelka
AU - Corti, Paulo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The author(s) and 2024 Universidad de Concepción.
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - The Chilean Patagonia is characterized by extensive protected areas that encompass most of the region. Mammals are often among the priorities for these protected areas either as conservation targets (e.g., threatened species) or as threats (e.g., invasive species). Camera traps offer a cost-effective alternative to monitor these species, however baseline studies are scarce in the region. Therefore, our objective was to provide an assessment of camera-trapping detection rates for mammals that are present in protected areas of Magallanes, Chilean Patagonia. Between 2015 and 2022 we installed 278 camera traps (9,936 trap-days), distributed in seven protected areas. For each protected area, we calculated the detection rates and proportion of camera traps that detected each species. We recorded 18 mammalian species, including ten native, four domestic, and four invasive species. The culpeo fox (Lycalopex culpaeus) was the most frequently detected species, followed by invasive European hare (Lepus europaeus) and puma (Puma concolor). Endangered species like the huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus) and southern river otter (Lontra provocax) were detected infrequently, whereas beaver (Castor canadensis) and American mink (Neogale vison) were only recorded in cameras that targeted them. From our data we suggest that generalist monitoring designs are likely to be effective for relatively common species like the culpeo fox. However, when species of interest are associated with specific features of the landscape (e.g., otters and water), other designs are needed. Based on our findings, we provide recommendations for the design of camera-trapping monitoring plans in protected areas.
AB - The Chilean Patagonia is characterized by extensive protected areas that encompass most of the region. Mammals are often among the priorities for these protected areas either as conservation targets (e.g., threatened species) or as threats (e.g., invasive species). Camera traps offer a cost-effective alternative to monitor these species, however baseline studies are scarce in the region. Therefore, our objective was to provide an assessment of camera-trapping detection rates for mammals that are present in protected areas of Magallanes, Chilean Patagonia. Between 2015 and 2022 we installed 278 camera traps (9,936 trap-days), distributed in seven protected areas. For each protected area, we calculated the detection rates and proportion of camera traps that detected each species. We recorded 18 mammalian species, including ten native, four domestic, and four invasive species. The culpeo fox (Lycalopex culpaeus) was the most frequently detected species, followed by invasive European hare (Lepus europaeus) and puma (Puma concolor). Endangered species like the huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus) and southern river otter (Lontra provocax) were detected infrequently, whereas beaver (Castor canadensis) and American mink (Neogale vison) were only recorded in cameras that targeted them. From our data we suggest that generalist monitoring designs are likely to be effective for relatively common species like the culpeo fox. However, when species of interest are associated with specific features of the landscape (e.g., otters and water), other designs are needed. Based on our findings, we provide recommendations for the design of camera-trapping monitoring plans in protected areas.
KW - domestic animals
KW - exotic species
KW - protected area management
KW - threatened species
KW - wildlife monitoring
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85210268098
U2 - 10.4067/S0717-65382024000100027
DO - 10.4067/S0717-65382024000100027
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85210268098
SN - 0717-652X
VL - 88
SP - 27
EP - 43
JO - Gayana
JF - Gayana
IS - 1
ER -