A Comparison of Flow- and Pressure-Controlled Infusion Strategies for Microneedle-based Transdermal Drug Delivery

Microneedle-based transdermal drug delivery is considered an attractive alternative to conventional injections using hypodermic needles due to its minimally invasive and painless nature; this has the potential to improve patient adherence to medication regimens. Hollow microneedles (MNs) are sharp, sub-millimeter protrusions with a channel that serves as a fluidic interface with the skin. This technology could be coupled with micro-pumps, embedded sensors, actuators and electronics to create Micro Transdermal Interface Platforms - smart, wearable infusion systems capable of delivering precise microdoses over a prolonged period. Using 500 μm tall hollow microneedles, ex-vivo human skin and a customized application/retraction device, this work focuses on comparing two infusion control strategies, namely 'set pressure' (SP) and 'set flow' (SF) infusion. It was found that flow-controlled infusion was capable of delivering higher volumes than pressure-driven delivery, and a mean volume of 3.8 mL was delivered using a set flowrate of 50 μL/minute. This suggests that flow driven delivery is a better control strategy and confirms that MN array retraction is beneficial for transdermal MN infusion.