TY - JOUR
T1 - A cross-sectional survey of anaesthesia-related expectations amongst patients awaiting upper limb trauma surgery
AU - O’Donnell, Brian Declan
AU - Iohom, Gabriella
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Editura Clasium. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/10/1
Y1 - 2017/10/1
N2 - Background and aims: Little is known regarding patients’ anaesthesia-related expectations when presenting for upper limb trauma surgery. Methods: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional survey exploring prior anaesthetic experience, anaesthesia-related knowledge, anaesthesia expectations, the preoperative visit and factors likely to influence anaesthesia choice. The survey was completed by 192 patients. Results: Anaesthetists were identified as doctors by 52%; 53% were unaware of their planned anaesthesia; 58% indicated likely acceptance of regional anaesthesia. Information regarding anaesthesia originated mostly from surgeons (65%); 93% had not seen an anaesthetist at the time of the survey. Most believed anaesthesia involved ‘going to sleep’ (82%) and 71% expected to receive general anaesthesia. The preoperative anaesthesia visit was rated as important by 65% of patients. 78% indicated that provision of information would increase the likelihood of accepting regional anaesthesia. Reducing postoperative pain and nausea would influence 80% in choosing a regional technique. Conclusion: A knowledge deficit exists regarding anaesthesia modalities for upper limb trauma surgery.
AB - Background and aims: Little is known regarding patients’ anaesthesia-related expectations when presenting for upper limb trauma surgery. Methods: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional survey exploring prior anaesthetic experience, anaesthesia-related knowledge, anaesthesia expectations, the preoperative visit and factors likely to influence anaesthesia choice. The survey was completed by 192 patients. Results: Anaesthetists were identified as doctors by 52%; 53% were unaware of their planned anaesthesia; 58% indicated likely acceptance of regional anaesthesia. Information regarding anaesthesia originated mostly from surgeons (65%); 93% had not seen an anaesthetist at the time of the survey. Most believed anaesthesia involved ‘going to sleep’ (82%) and 71% expected to receive general anaesthesia. The preoperative anaesthesia visit was rated as important by 65% of patients. 78% indicated that provision of information would increase the likelihood of accepting regional anaesthesia. Reducing postoperative pain and nausea would influence 80% in choosing a regional technique. Conclusion: A knowledge deficit exists regarding anaesthesia modalities for upper limb trauma surgery.
KW - Anaesthesia
KW - General
KW - Patient expectations
KW - Postoperative analgesia
KW - Regional
KW - Survey
KW - Upper limb trauma surgery
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85032567142
U2 - 10.21454/rjaic.7518.242.bdo
DO - 10.21454/rjaic.7518.242.bdo
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85032567142
SN - 2392-7518
VL - 24
SP - 133
EP - 138
JO - Romanian Journal of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
JF - Romanian Journal of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
IS - 2
ER -