TY - JOUR
T1 - A qualitative study exploring the desired elements, potential benefits, barriers and facilitators of a physiotherapy-led exercise-based service in a primary care setting to improve the quality of life of people with metastatic breast cancer
AU - O'Riordan, J. M.C.V.
AU - McCullagh, Ruth
AU - Sheill, Grainne
AU - French, Helen P.
AU - Horgan, Frances
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objective: Cancer rehabilitation interventions can improve quality of life (QOL) in people with metastatic breast cancer (PwMBC), but little is known on how to tailor cancer rehabilitation strategies in a primary care (primary care) setting. Using Focus Group Discussion (FGDs) including PwMBC and physiotherapists, this qualitative study aimed to explore the desired elements, potential benefits, barriers and facilitators of a proposed physiotherapy-led, exercise-based cancer rehabilitation service in a primary care setting to improve the QOL of PwMBC. Methods: We used a World Café approach guided by interpretative description qualitative methodology and the Braun and Clarke process. We included PwMBC and physiotherapists working in primary care, national and local acute oncology and palliative care services in three FGDs. All FGDs were transcribed and analysed inductively. The COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research checklist was used. Results: FGD1 (N = 13) comprised of physiotherapists working in primary care and national acute oncology care settings. FGD2 included PwMBC (N = 4). FGD3 (N = 4) included physiotherapists working in palliative and local acute care settings. Three themes were identified. 1. ‘Empowerment’ highlighted potential benefits and facilitators including the maintenance of overall health, a self-management approach, symptom management and maintaining independence. 2. ‘Social safety’ outlined elements of the proposed intervention including primary care setting, multi-disciplinary approach, appropriate resources and access to information. 3. ‘Trust’ suggested barriers including lack of: suitably trained therapists to provide intervention, bidirectional communication, shared care management and the importance of causing no harm. Conclusions: PwMBC are underrepresented in cancer rehabilitation and this research provides evidence supporting strategies and interventions to optimise rehabilitation of PwMBC. Contribution of the Paper: • There are unique barriers to providing cancer rehabilitation to patients with metastatic cancer outside of the acute hospital environment. • The perspectives and preferences of PwMBC and physiotherapists need to be considered for the successful implementation of in order for improvements in the management of PwMBC survivorship to be realised. • PwMBC and physiotherapists highlighted a need for all healthcare teams to work together in an integrated way to deliver the identified elements, benefits and facilitators of a primary care physiotherapy-led cancer rehabilitation service.
AB - Objective: Cancer rehabilitation interventions can improve quality of life (QOL) in people with metastatic breast cancer (PwMBC), but little is known on how to tailor cancer rehabilitation strategies in a primary care (primary care) setting. Using Focus Group Discussion (FGDs) including PwMBC and physiotherapists, this qualitative study aimed to explore the desired elements, potential benefits, barriers and facilitators of a proposed physiotherapy-led, exercise-based cancer rehabilitation service in a primary care setting to improve the QOL of PwMBC. Methods: We used a World Café approach guided by interpretative description qualitative methodology and the Braun and Clarke process. We included PwMBC and physiotherapists working in primary care, national and local acute oncology and palliative care services in three FGDs. All FGDs were transcribed and analysed inductively. The COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research checklist was used. Results: FGD1 (N = 13) comprised of physiotherapists working in primary care and national acute oncology care settings. FGD2 included PwMBC (N = 4). FGD3 (N = 4) included physiotherapists working in palliative and local acute care settings. Three themes were identified. 1. ‘Empowerment’ highlighted potential benefits and facilitators including the maintenance of overall health, a self-management approach, symptom management and maintaining independence. 2. ‘Social safety’ outlined elements of the proposed intervention including primary care setting, multi-disciplinary approach, appropriate resources and access to information. 3. ‘Trust’ suggested barriers including lack of: suitably trained therapists to provide intervention, bidirectional communication, shared care management and the importance of causing no harm. Conclusions: PwMBC are underrepresented in cancer rehabilitation and this research provides evidence supporting strategies and interventions to optimise rehabilitation of PwMBC. Contribution of the Paper: • There are unique barriers to providing cancer rehabilitation to patients with metastatic cancer outside of the acute hospital environment. • The perspectives and preferences of PwMBC and physiotherapists need to be considered for the successful implementation of in order for improvements in the management of PwMBC survivorship to be realised. • PwMBC and physiotherapists highlighted a need for all healthcare teams to work together in an integrated way to deliver the identified elements, benefits and facilitators of a primary care physiotherapy-led cancer rehabilitation service.
KW - Interpretative description qualitative methodology
KW - Metastatic breast neoplasm
KW - Physiotherapy cancer rehabilitation
KW - Primary care
KW - World Café
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020083876
U2 - 10.1016/j.physio.2025.101812
DO - 10.1016/j.physio.2025.101812
M3 - Article
C2 - 41130824
AN - SCOPUS:105020083876
SN - 0031-9406
JO - Physiotherapy (United Kingdom)
JF - Physiotherapy (United Kingdom)
M1 - 101812
ER -