Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A three-arm randomised phase II study of the MEK inhibitor selumetinib alone or in combination with paclitaxel in metastatic uveal melanoma

  • Joseph J Sacco
  • , Richard Jackson
  • , Pippa Corrie
  • , Sarah Danson
  • , T R Jeffry Evans
  • , Sebastian Ochsenreither
  • , Satish Kumar
  • , Andrew Goodman
  • , James Larkin
  • , Ioannis Karydis
  • , Neil Steven
  • , Paul Lorigan
  • , Ruth Plummer
  • , Poulam Patel
  • , Eftychia Psarelli
  • , Anna Olsson-Brown
  • , Heather Shaw
  • , Serge Leyvraz
  • , Louise Handley
  • , Charlotte Rawcliffe
  • Paul Nathan
  • Liverpool Hospital
  • Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre University of Liverpool
  • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Sheffield
  • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Glasgow
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • Velindre University NHS Trust
  • Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
  • The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
  • The Christie Hospital
  • Freeman Hospital
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Mount Vernon Cancer Centre
  • University of Liverpool

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

AIMS: The MAPK pathway is constitutively activated in uveal melanoma (UM). Selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886), a MEK inhibitor, has shown limited activity as monotherapy in metastatic UM. Pre-clinical studies support synergistic cytotoxic activity for MEK inhibitors combined with taxanes, and here we sought to assess the clinical efficacy of combining selumetinib and paclitaxel.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with metastatic UM who had not received prior chemotherapy were randomised to selumetinib alone, or combined with paclitaxel with or without interruption in selumetinib two days before paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). After amendment, the combination arms were combined for analysis and the sample size adjusted to detect a hazard ratio (HR): 0.55, 80% power at 1-sided 5% significance level.

RESULTS: The median PFS in the combination arms was 4.8 months (95% CI: 3.8 - 5.6) compared with 3.4 months (2.0 - 3.9) in the selumetinib arm (HR 0.62 [90% CI 0.41 - 0.92], 1-sided p-value = 0.022). ORR was 14% and 4% in the combination and monotherapy arms respectively. Median OS was 9 months for the combination and was not significantly different from selumetinib alone (10 months) with HR of 0.98 [90% CI 0.58 - 1.66], 1-sided p-value = 0.469. Toxicity was in keeping with the known profiles of the agents involved.

CONCLUSIONS: SelPac met its primary endpoint, demonstrating an improvement in PFS for combination selumetinib and paclitaxel. No improvement in OS was observed, and the modest improvement in PFS is not practice changing.

Original languageEnglish
Article number114009
Pages (from-to)114009
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume202
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
  • Benzimidazoles
  • Humans
  • Melanoma/pathology
  • Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases
  • Paclitaxel/adverse effects
  • Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects
  • Uveal Melanoma
  • Uveal Neoplasms

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A three-arm randomised phase II study of the MEK inhibitor selumetinib alone or in combination with paclitaxel in metastatic uveal melanoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this