African agency in geopolitical times: playing with EU and Chinese ontological security

  • Niall Duggan
  • , Toni Haastrup
  • , John J. Hogan
  • , Luis Mah
  • , Luís Bernardo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In 2021 the European Union (EU) launched Global Gateway (GG). This new €300 billion European strategy is intended to boost the EU’s involvement in areas such as transport infrastructure, green energy, and digitalisation in developing countries. The African continent is expected to benefit with half of the expected figures. Much of the debate in the past few years has attempted to dissect the (geo)political, financial and economic dimensions of GG from the perspective of Brussels and EU Member States’ policymakers. However, very little has been discussed on how African policymakers have perceived GG. This paper will thus focus on African agency in the context of GG and the broader framework of Africa–EU relations. Moreover, it will compare this agency with that which has been displayed in the past decade of relations between Africa and China. Drawing on an ontological security analytical framework, the paper seeks to understand the new dynamics and contestations of African agency in the continent’s relations with the EU and China that have been ignored in both mainstream and critical approaches to EU foreign policy studies.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThird World Quarterly
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  3. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Keywords

  • African agency
  • Belt and Road Initiative
  • China
  • EU
  • Global Gateway
  • ontological security

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'African agency in geopolitical times: playing with EU and Chinese ontological security'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this