Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

AI for mental health: clinician expectations and priorities in computational psychiatry

  • Leo Fischer
  • , Paula Antonia Mann
  • , Minh Hieu H. Nguyen
  • , Stefan Becker
  • , Shiva Khodadadi
  • , Antonia Schulz
  • , Sharmili Edwin Thanarajah
  • , Jonathan Repple
  • , Tim Hahn
  • , Andreas Reif
  • , Amir Salamikhanshan
  • , Sarah Kittel-Schneider
  • , Winfried Rief
  • , Christoph Mulert
  • , Stefan G. Hofmann
  • , Udo Dannlowski
  • , Tilo Kircher
  • , Felix P. Bernhard
  • , Hamidreza Jamalabadi
  • University of Marburg
  • Goethe University Frankfurt
  • University of Münster
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP
  • University of Würzburg
  • Justus Liebig University Giessen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Mental disorders represent a major global health challenge, with an estimated lifetime prevalence approaching 30%. Despite the availability of effective treatments, access to mental health care remains inadequate. Computational psychiatry, leveraging advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), has shown potential for transforming mental health care by improving diagnosis, prognosis, and the personalization of treatment. However, integrating these technologies into routine clinical practice remains limited due to technical and infrastructure challenges. While ongoing computational developments will enhance AI’s precision, many studies focus on its broad potential without providing specific, clinician-informed guidance for immediate application. To address this gap and the urgent need for clinically actionable AI tools, we surveyed 53 psychiatrists and clinical psychologists to identify their priorities for AI in mental health care. Our findings reveal a strong preference for tools enabling continuous monitoring and predictive modeling, particularly in outpatient settings. Clinicians prioritize accurate predictions of symptom trajectories and proactive patient monitoring over interpretability and explicit treatment recommendations. Self-reports, third-party observations, and sleep quality and duration emerged as key data inputs for effective models. Together, this study provides a clinician-driven roadmap for AI integration, emphasizing predictive models based on ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data to forecast disorder trajectories and support real-world practice.

Original languageEnglish
Article number584
JournalBMC Psychiatry
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • AI
  • Clinician expectations
  • Computational psychiatry
  • Ecological momentary assessment (EMA)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'AI for mental health: clinician expectations and priorities in computational psychiatry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this