TY - JOUR
T1 - All-ceramic inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses for replacing posterior missing teeth
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Castillo-Oyagüe, Raquel
AU - Sancho-Esper, Rocío
AU - Lynch, Christopher D.
AU - Suárez-García, María Jesús
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Japan Prosthodontic Society
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - Purpose To evaluate the current status of all-ceramic inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses (CIR-FDPs) for the replacement of posterior teeth. Study selection Screening of titles and abstracts, full-text analysis for inclusion eligibility, quality assessment, data extraction and evaluation of the scientific evidence were performed independently by two reviewers. The electronic databases MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Compludoc were searched with no restriction to publication date or language. The quality of the studies was evaluated through: the original ‘QDP’ (‘Questionnaire for selecting articles on Dental Prostheses’) (for research papers); the ‘Guidelines for managing overviews’ of the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (for reviews); the Cochrane risk of bias tool; and the GRADE scale for grading scientific evidence. Results This review started with 4942 articles, which were narrowed down to 23 according to the selection criteria. The data was not statistically treated because of the heterogeneity of the studies. Zirconia-based CIR-FDPs may be recommended for restoring posterior single missing teeth, although the prosthesis/tooth bonded interface has yet to be improved. The addition of lateral wings to the classical inlay preparation seems promising. The weakest parts of CIR-FDPs are the connectors and retainers, while caries and endodontic problems are the most common biological complications. The fabrication of CIR-FDPs with monolithic zirconia may eliminate chipping problems. Conclusions A three-unit CIR-FDP is a viable treatment option for replacing a posterior missing tooth. Appropriate case selection, abutment preparation and luting procedures may be decisive for clinical success.
AB - Purpose To evaluate the current status of all-ceramic inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses (CIR-FDPs) for the replacement of posterior teeth. Study selection Screening of titles and abstracts, full-text analysis for inclusion eligibility, quality assessment, data extraction and evaluation of the scientific evidence were performed independently by two reviewers. The electronic databases MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Compludoc were searched with no restriction to publication date or language. The quality of the studies was evaluated through: the original ‘QDP’ (‘Questionnaire for selecting articles on Dental Prostheses’) (for research papers); the ‘Guidelines for managing overviews’ of the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (for reviews); the Cochrane risk of bias tool; and the GRADE scale for grading scientific evidence. Results This review started with 4942 articles, which were narrowed down to 23 according to the selection criteria. The data was not statistically treated because of the heterogeneity of the studies. Zirconia-based CIR-FDPs may be recommended for restoring posterior single missing teeth, although the prosthesis/tooth bonded interface has yet to be improved. The addition of lateral wings to the classical inlay preparation seems promising. The weakest parts of CIR-FDPs are the connectors and retainers, while caries and endodontic problems are the most common biological complications. The fabrication of CIR-FDPs with monolithic zirconia may eliminate chipping problems. Conclusions A three-unit CIR-FDP is a viable treatment option for replacing a posterior missing tooth. Appropriate case selection, abutment preparation and luting procedures may be decisive for clinical success.
KW - Adhesive restorations
KW - Inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)
KW - Lithium-disilicate ceramic
KW - Monolithic zirconia
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85025449378
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.06.007
DO - 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.06.007
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28735678
AN - SCOPUS:85025449378
SN - 1883-1958
VL - 62
SP - 10
EP - 23
JO - Journal of Prosthodontic Research
JF - Journal of Prosthodontic Research
IS - 1
ER -