Anti-endomysial antibody negative celiac disease: Does additional serological testing help?

  • Anna Dahele
  • , Kathleen Kingstone
  • , John Bode
  • , Diane Anderson
  • , Subrata Ghosh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Anti-endomysium antibodies (AEM) fail to identify all untreated celiac disease (CD) patients. This study aims to determine if additional serology, in particular, IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibodies, increases detection. Fifty-three biopsy-proven untreated CD patients (39 women, 14 men; median age 51 years) and 65 control patients with normal duodenal histology (46 women, 19 men; age range 17-90 years, median 45 years) were prospectively studied. Serum total IgA, IgA anti-tTG, IgA AEM, IgA anti-gliadin (AGA) and IgG AGA antibodies were measured. Thirteen (25%) CD patients were AEM negative. None were IgA deficient, Three AEM-negative CD patients had a raised IgA anti-tTG and IgA AGA. IgG AGA was raised in 10 AEM-negative CD patients, but also in 14/65 (22%) of controls. In conclusion, AEM-negative CD is common and detection is only modestly enhanced by testing for IgA anti-tTG antibodies. Duodenal biopsy is still recommended for the accurate diagnosis of CD.

Original languageEnglish
Article number228722
Pages (from-to)214-221
Number of pages8
JournalDigestive Diseases and Sciences
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Anti-endomysium antibodies
  • Anti-gliadin antibodies
  • Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies
  • Celiac disease

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anti-endomysial antibody negative celiac disease: Does additional serological testing help?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this