Application of passive (SPATT) and active sampling methods in the profiling and monitoring of marine biotoxins

  • Moira McCarthy
  • , Frank N.A.M. Van Pelt
  • , Vaishali Bane
  • , John O'Halloran
  • , Ambrose Furey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Solid phase adsorbent and toxin tracking (SPATT) enables temporally and spatially integrated monitoring of biotoxins in aquatic environments. Monitoring using two adsorbent resins was performed over a four-month period at Lough Hyne Marine Reserve, Ireland. A range of Diarhettic Shellfish Poisoning (DSP) toxins were detected from SPATT extracts throughout the study period. The majority of biotoxins were detected in the top 20-30 m of the water column and a spike in toxin accumulation was measured during August 2010. Phytoplankton analysis confirmed the presence of toxin-producing species Dinophysis acuta and Dinophysis acuminata during the bloom. SPATT has the potential to provide useful information on phycotoxin distribution in the water column; enabling evidence-based decisions regarding appropriate depths for obtaining phytoplankton and shellfish samples in marine biotoxin monitoring programmes. Active sampling was performed continuously over 7-days and high quantities of toxins were successfully accumulated in the HP-20 resin, okadaic acid (∼13 mg), dinophysis toxin-2 (∼29 mg), pectenotoxin-2 (∼20 mg) and pectenotoxin-2-seco acid (∼6 mg) proving this an effective method for accumulating DSP toxins from the marine environment. The method has potential application as a tool for assessing toxin profiles at proposed shellfish harvesting sites.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-86
Number of pages10
JournalToxicon
Volume89
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2014

Keywords

  • Biotoxins
  • DSP
  • HABs
  • LC-MS
  • Shellfish
  • SPATT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Application of passive (SPATT) and active sampling methods in the profiling and monitoring of marine biotoxins'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this