Abstract
This study uses the wellbeing valuation method to monetise the association between water flooding or roadworks incidents and subjective wellbeing for customers served by Anglian Water in the UK. Using this method, we find that the estimated wellbeing cost per incident for flooding is considerably higher than for roadworks, that internal sewer flooding is associated with a higher wellbeing cost per property than external sewer flooding, and that internal water flooding has a lower estimated wellbeing cost per property than internal sewer flooding. The findings were used in Anglian Water’s 2019 Price Review (PR19) business planning. By providing a wellbeing valuation for events that have also been studied through stated preference models, this research also provides a case study for comparing the differences in results between the two valuation methodologies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 95-111 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2022 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- C81
- flooding
- I31
- life satisfaction
- Q510
- R41
- roadworks
- stated preference
- subjective wellbeing
- Wellbeing valuation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Applying the wellbeing valuation method to value the costs of roadworks and flooding'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver