Abstract
It is recognised that urogynaecological symptoms can have a significant impact on patient quality of life (QoL). Many of the QoL questionnaires are long and provide a burden to patients. The aim of this study was to compare patients' responses to utilising equivalent QoL questionnaires in different formats. The electronic personal assessment questionnaire, ePAQ-PF, was compared to the paper-based Queensland questionnaire. ePAQ-PF appeared to be of greater value but not more burdensome. However, women were more likely to complete the sexual function section using the Queensland questionnaire.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 390-392 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2014 |
Keywords
- ePAQ-PF
- pelvic floor symptoms
- QQ-10
- Queensland
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing quality of life questionnaires in urogynaecology - Tick or type?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver