Assessing the feasibility of achieving biological nutrient removal from wastewater at an Irish food processing factory

  • Donal Mulkerrins
  • , Eamon O'Connor
  • , Bernadette Lawlee
  • , Pat Barton
  • , Alan Dobson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In Ireland, wastewaters emanating from the food industry typically contain elevated levels of nitrogen and phosphorus before treatment. Two pilot scale studies were performed to determine the feasibility of achieving biological N and P removal on-site at a food ingredients plant. The wastewater treated by the pilot reactors was that which resulted from the day-to-day production in the full-scale food ingredients plant. Both reactors were of the anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A/A/O) design, however the sizing of the zones was varied in this study. In the first pilot study, while treating a wastewater of the following strength: 1008 mgCOD/l; 30.1 mgNH4-N/l and 26.7 mgP/l, removal efficiencies of 93%, 99% and 98% were obtained for COD, NH 4-N and P, respectively. In the second study, while operating at reduced hydraulic retention times and lower recycle rates, the pilot plant treated a wastewater of the following strength: 1757 mgCOD/l; 62 mgNH 4-N/l and 57 mgP/l, with removal efficiencies of 94%, 97% and 75% obtained for COD, NH4-N and P, respectively. This work showed that biological nutrient removal could be successfully applied to treatment of food industry wastewaters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-214
Number of pages8
JournalBioresource Technology
Volume91
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2004

Keywords

  • Anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A/A/O) reactors
  • Biological phosphate removal
  • Dairy wastewater
  • Denitrification
  • Hydraulic retention time
  • Nitrification
  • Recycle flowrates
  • Seasonal performance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the feasibility of achieving biological nutrient removal from wastewater at an Irish food processing factory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this