Abstract
This commentary considers company-sponsored fertility benefits (CSFBs) and their use by organizations. We highlight the lack of attention to these benefits in the gender and management literature. Indeed, despite the importance of the topic very few gender researchers, and even fewer management scholars have deemed the erosion of female reproductive rights and commodification of fertility in the workplace worthy of debate. We, therefore, call on gender researchers, and in particular management scholars to stop sitting on the sideliners.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1702-1708 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Gender, Work and Organization |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - Sep 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
Keywords
- company-sponsored fertility benefits
- fertility debates
- gender and management research
- reproductive rights
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Bodily Autonomy, Reproductive Rights and Company-Sponsored Fertility Benefits: A Call to Action'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver