Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cardio-oncology research prioritisation in the United Kingdom: national surveys of health care professionals, patients and carers

  • Gerard M Walls
  • , Allyson Arnold
  • , David Austin
  • , Alison R Fielding
  • , Simon P Fisher
  • , Christopher A Miller
  • , Charlotte Manisty
  • , Anna Olsson-Brown
  • , Mark C Petrie
  • , John A Snowden
  • , Nick Hartshorne-Evans
  • , Keith Wilson
  • , Vasilena Zhecheva
  • , Ninian N Lang
  • Queen's University Belfast
  • British Cardiovascular Society
  • James Cook University Hospital
  • Independent patient advocate
  • University of Oxford
  • Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
  • Barts Heart Centre
  • University of Glasgow
  • Steering Committee of the National Centre for III-V Technologies, University of Sheffield, UK
  • Pumping Marvellous Foundation
  • Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relevance of cardiovascular disease in people with a history of cancer has increased in parallel with dramatic improvements in cancer-specific outcomes. There is an urgent need to improve the evidence underpinning cardio-oncology practice. Research prioritisation is essential and needs to account for multidisciplinary healthcare professional (HCP) perspectives, as well as patients and carers.

METHODS: The NIHR-BHF Cardiovascular Partnership Theme in Cardio-Oncology conducted two UK-wide online surveys to identify research priorities. The first was distributed to HCPs with cardiology, oncology and haemato-oncology backgrounds. The second was distributed to patients and carers (PCs) with experience of cancer and/or cardiovascular disease. Surveys were co-designed by clinicians and patients.

RESULTS: HCP Survey: 127 responded; 53% prioritised research 'during cancer treatment'. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies were identified as the highest-priority drug classes. Cardiac dysfunction/heart failure (53%) and myocarditis (22%) were priority cardiovascular toxicities of interest. The development of a cardio-oncology registry was marginally favoured over randomised trials. Prospective randomised open-label blinded endpoints (PROBE) designs were considered of similar priority to double-blinded placebo controlled trials. PC Survey: 267 responded. 54% were concerned about the impact of cancer treatment upon cardiovascular health. PC research priorities were: prevention of cardiac side effects (58%), long-term cardiac monitoring, and early detection of side effects. Willingness to participate in research was high.

CONCLUSION: HCPs and PCs from the UK prioritised prevention and detection of cardiac dysfunction during and immediately following cancer therapy, particularly with agents such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies. These findings provide important strategy-setting insights for large-scale collaborative cardio-oncology studies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number90
JournalCardio-Oncology
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 May 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Cardio-oncology
  • Cardiotoxicity
  • National survey
  • Patient perception
  • Research strategy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cardio-oncology research prioritisation in the United Kingdom: national surveys of health care professionals, patients and carers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this