TY - JOUR
T1 - Cetacean abundance and distribution in European Atlantic shelf waters to inform conservation and management
AU - Hammond, Philip S.
AU - Macleod, Kelly
AU - Berggren, Per
AU - Borchers, David L.
AU - Burt, Louise
AU - Cañadas, Ana
AU - Desportes, Geneviève
AU - Donovan, Greg P.
AU - Gilles, Anita
AU - Gillespie, Douglas
AU - Gordon, Jonathan
AU - Hiby, Lex
AU - Kuklik, Iwona
AU - Leaper, Russell
AU - Lehnert, Kristina
AU - Leopold, Mardik
AU - Lovell, Phil
AU - Øien, Nils
AU - Paxton, Charles G.M.
AU - Ridoux, Vincent
AU - Rogan, Emer
AU - Samarra, Filipa
AU - Scheidat, Meike
AU - Sequeira, Marina
AU - Siebert, Ursula
AU - Skov, Henrik
AU - Swift, René
AU - Tasker, Mark L.
AU - Teilmann, Jonas
AU - Van Canneyt, Olivier
AU - Vázquez, José Antonio
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - The European Union (EU) Habitats Directive requires Member States to monitor and maintain at favourable conservation status those species identified to be in need of protection, including all cetaceans. In July 2005 we surveyed the entire EU Atlantic continental shelf to generate robust estimates of abundance for harbour porpoise and other cetacean species. The survey used line transect sampling methods and purpose built data collection equipment designed to minimise bias in estimates of abundance. Shipboard transects covered 19,725km in sea conditions ≤Beaufort 4 in an area of 1,005,743km2. Aerial transects covered 15,802km in good/moderate conditions (≤Beaufort 3) in an area of 364,371km2. Thirteen cetacean species were recorded; abundance was estimated for harbour porpoise (375,358; CV=0.197), bottlenose dolphin (16,485; CV=0.422), white-beaked dolphin (16,536; CV=0.303), short-beaked common dolphin (56,221; CV=0.234) and minke whale (18,958; CV=0.347). Abundance in 2005 was similar to that estimated in July 1994 for harbour porpoise, white-beaked dolphin and minke whale in a comparable area. However, model-based density surfaces showed a marked difference in harbour porpoise distribution between 1994 and 2005. Our results allow EU Member States to discharge their responsibilities under the Habitats Directive and inform other international organisations concerning the assessment of conservation status of cetaceans and the impact of bycatch at a large spatial scale. The lack of evidence for a change in harbour porpoise abundance in EU waters as a whole does not exclude the possibility of an impact of bycatch in some areas. Monitoring bycatch and estimation of abundance continue to be essential.
AB - The European Union (EU) Habitats Directive requires Member States to monitor and maintain at favourable conservation status those species identified to be in need of protection, including all cetaceans. In July 2005 we surveyed the entire EU Atlantic continental shelf to generate robust estimates of abundance for harbour porpoise and other cetacean species. The survey used line transect sampling methods and purpose built data collection equipment designed to minimise bias in estimates of abundance. Shipboard transects covered 19,725km in sea conditions ≤Beaufort 4 in an area of 1,005,743km2. Aerial transects covered 15,802km in good/moderate conditions (≤Beaufort 3) in an area of 364,371km2. Thirteen cetacean species were recorded; abundance was estimated for harbour porpoise (375,358; CV=0.197), bottlenose dolphin (16,485; CV=0.422), white-beaked dolphin (16,536; CV=0.303), short-beaked common dolphin (56,221; CV=0.234) and minke whale (18,958; CV=0.347). Abundance in 2005 was similar to that estimated in July 1994 for harbour porpoise, white-beaked dolphin and minke whale in a comparable area. However, model-based density surfaces showed a marked difference in harbour porpoise distribution between 1994 and 2005. Our results allow EU Member States to discharge their responsibilities under the Habitats Directive and inform other international organisations concerning the assessment of conservation status of cetaceans and the impact of bycatch at a large spatial scale. The lack of evidence for a change in harbour porpoise abundance in EU waters as a whole does not exclude the possibility of an impact of bycatch in some areas. Monitoring bycatch and estimation of abundance continue to be essential.
KW - Bottlenose dolphin
KW - Bycatch
KW - Common dolphin
KW - Conservation status
KW - Habitats Directive
KW - Harbour porpoise
KW - Line transect sampling
KW - Minke whale
KW - North Sea
KW - SCANS
KW - White-beaked dolphin
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84876433065
U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.04.010
DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.04.010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84876433065
SN - 0006-3207
VL - 164
SP - 107
EP - 122
JO - Biological Conservation
JF - Biological Conservation
ER -