TY - CHAP
T1 - Children in liminality
T2 - Case studies from Ireland and Iran
AU - Sharifi Isaloo, Amin
AU - Cummins, Annie
N1 - Cummins, A, M. & Sharifi Isaloo, A. (2019) ‘Children in liminality: Case studies from Ireland and Iran’ in Nicolás Brando and Gottfried Schweiger (eds) ‘Philosophy and Child Poverty: Reflections on the Ethics and Politics of Poor Children and their families’, Cham: Springer, Pp. 245-267.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Children living in poverty are excluded from certain opportunities and are susceptible to a range of cognitive, social and emotional problems. This chapter addresses the institutionalisation of enforced poverty experienced by children who are asylum-seekers and refugees in Ireland and Iran. It cuts across the disciplines of philosophy, sociology and anthropology in order to re-think the approaches to child poverty.
Drawing on Victor Turner’s concept of liminality and Vittorio Bufacchi’s three-dimensional approach to social injustice, this chapter addresses the institutional practices of social injustice that perpetuate child poverty for children living in liminality. It consists of a comparative analysis of the governmental practices and policies that extend poverty for children who are living in Ireland and Iran. While both these countries have divergent approaches to addressing the needs of young asylum seekers and refugees, the children have similar experiences of vulnerability, poverty and social exclusion. Thus, the aim of this chapter is to examine how children of asylum seekers and refugees experience poverty while in a transition stage in their host country. In turn, it aims to rethink the relationship between institutional practices and global child poverty.
AB - Children living in poverty are excluded from certain opportunities and are susceptible to a range of cognitive, social and emotional problems. This chapter addresses the institutionalisation of enforced poverty experienced by children who are asylum-seekers and refugees in Ireland and Iran. It cuts across the disciplines of philosophy, sociology and anthropology in order to re-think the approaches to child poverty.
Drawing on Victor Turner’s concept of liminality and Vittorio Bufacchi’s three-dimensional approach to social injustice, this chapter addresses the institutional practices of social injustice that perpetuate child poverty for children living in liminality. It consists of a comparative analysis of the governmental practices and policies that extend poverty for children who are living in Ireland and Iran. While both these countries have divergent approaches to addressing the needs of young asylum seekers and refugees, the children have similar experiences of vulnerability, poverty and social exclusion. Thus, the aim of this chapter is to examine how children of asylum seekers and refugees experience poverty while in a transition stage in their host country. In turn, it aims to rethink the relationship between institutional practices and global child poverty.
UR - https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030224516
M3 - Chapter
SP - 245
EP - 267
BT - Philosophy and Poverty
ER -