TY - CHAP
T1 - Community-aware diversification of recommendations
AU - Kaya, Mesut
AU - Bridge, Derek
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Association for Computing Machinery.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Intent-aware methods for recommendation diversification seek to ensure that the recommended items cover so-called aspects, which are assumed to define the user's tastes and interests. Most typically, aspects are item features such as movie or music genres. In recent work, we presented a novel intent-aware diversification method, called Subprofile-Aware Diversification (SPAD). In SPAD, aspects are subprofiles of the active user's profile, detected using an item-item similarity method. In this paper, we propose Community-Aware Diversification (CAD), in which aspects are again subprofiles but are detected indirectly through users who are similar to the active user. We evaluate CAD's precision and diversity on four different datasets, and compare it with SPAD and an intent-aware diversification method called xQuAD. We show that on two of the datasets SPAD outperforms CAD, but for the other two CAD outperforms SPAD. For all datasets, both CAD and SPAD achieve higher precision than xQuAD. When it comes to diversity, xQuAD sometimes results in more diverse recommendations but it is more prone to paying for this diversity with decreases in precision. Arguably, SPAD and CAD strike a better balance between the two.
AB - Intent-aware methods for recommendation diversification seek to ensure that the recommended items cover so-called aspects, which are assumed to define the user's tastes and interests. Most typically, aspects are item features such as movie or music genres. In recent work, we presented a novel intent-aware diversification method, called Subprofile-Aware Diversification (SPAD). In SPAD, aspects are subprofiles of the active user's profile, detected using an item-item similarity method. In this paper, we propose Community-Aware Diversification (CAD), in which aspects are again subprofiles but are detected indirectly through users who are similar to the active user. We evaluate CAD's precision and diversity on four different datasets, and compare it with SPAD and an intent-aware diversification method called xQuAD. We show that on two of the datasets SPAD outperforms CAD, but for the other two CAD outperforms SPAD. For all datasets, both CAD and SPAD achieve higher precision than xQuAD. When it comes to diversity, xQuAD sometimes results in more diverse recommendations but it is more prone to paying for this diversity with decreases in precision. Arguably, SPAD and CAD strike a better balance between the two.
KW - Diversity
KW - Intent-aware
KW - Subprofiles
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85065652332
U2 - 10.1145/3297280.3297439
DO - 10.1145/3297280.3297439
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85065652332
SN - 9781450359337
T3 - Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
SP - 1639
EP - 1646
BT - Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
PB - Association for Computing Machinery
T2 - 34th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC 2019
Y2 - 8 April 2019 through 12 April 2019
ER -