Comparison of outcomes of twins conceived spontaneously and by artificial reproductive therapy

  • Akila Anbazhagan
  • , Alyson Hunter
  • , Fionnuala M. Breathnach
  • , Fionnuala M. McAuliffe
  • , Michael P. Geary
  • , Sean Daly
  • , John R. Higgins
  • , John J. Morrison
  • , Gerard Burke
  • , Shane Higgins
  • , Patrick Dicker
  • , Elizabeth Tully
  • , Stephen Carroll
  • , Fergal D. Malone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To compare the outcomes of twin pregnancies conceived by artificial reproductive techniques (ART) with those of spontaneous conception. Study design: In this multicenter prospective trial, comparisons were made between methods of conception in twin pregnancies, for maternal and perinatal outcomes. Results: Of 1001 twin pairs, 763/1001 (72.7%) were spontaneously conceived and 238/1001(27.3%) were conceived by ART. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to obstetric complications. There were 13 per 1000 (20/1504; 1%) perinatal deaths in the spontaneously conceived group and 6 per 1000 (3/466; 0.6%) in the ART group (p = 0.8141). We found no differences in gestational age at delivery (median 36.9 versus 37.0 weeks), birth weight (median 2520 g versus 2538 g), or in a composite measure of adverse perinatal outcome (17% versus 15%) between the groups. Conclusion: There were no differences in the rate of adverse obstetric or perinatal outcomes between twins conceived naturally compared with twins conceived by assisted conception.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)458-462
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

Keywords

  • Assisted reproduction
  • Mode of conception
  • Perinatal outcomes
  • Spontaneous conception
  • Twin pregnancy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of outcomes of twins conceived spontaneously and by artificial reproductive therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this