Abstract
DNA is an important tool for criminal investigations and prosecutions. There has been considerable comment on its collection and retention from adult suspects and convicted persons, but little analysis of the particular situation of young people in the youth justice system. This article considers the competing paradigms at play when young persons' DNA is collected and stored. The tensions between expanded DNA powers and norms of youth justice such as reintegration and best interests are considered as well as the implications for young persons' rights.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3-18 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Youth Justice |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- comparative analysis
- DNA
- human rights
- policy transfer
- youth justice
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Competing Paradigms? The Use of DNA Powers in Youth Justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver