Confessional critiques: Parrhesia and avowal in contemporary anti-racist discourses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Confessional critiques proliferate in contemporary culture, remodelling critical politics as self-purification. Within Foucault’s work, critique is associated with resistance to power and subjectification, whereas confession appears a technique of disciplinary and pastoral power. However, genealogy creates hybrids, and herein we observe how critique and confession are entangled in contemporary social justice discourses, focusing empirically on contemporary anti-racist texts. These critique their imagined readers and society more generally, demanding confessions, castigating denials and exhorting interminable purificatory self-work. This analysis draws from Foucault’s genealogies of parrhesia and avowal, through his latter works on the problem of ‘truth-telling’ and how it forms subjects, even by critique. Recognising this historical hybridisation of critique and confession within discourses such as anti-racism may help to clarify the political stakes of critique.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-59
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Theory
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • Confession
  • critique
  • Foucault
  • parrhesia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Confessional critiques: Parrhesia and avowal in contemporary anti-racist discourses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this