Controlling blown pack spoilage using anti-microbial packaging

  • Rachael Reid
  • , Andrey A. Tyuftin
  • , Joe P. Kerry
  • , Séamus Fanning
  • , Paul Whyte
  • , Declan Bolton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Active (anti-microbial) packaging was prepared using three different formulations; Auranta FV; Inbac-MDA and sodium octanoate at two concentrations (2.5 and 3.5 times their minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC, the lowest concentration that will inhibit the visible growth of the organisms) against Clostridium estertheticum, DSMZ 8809). Inoculated beef samples were packaged using the active packaging and monitored for 100 days storage at 2C for blown pack spoilage. The time to the onset of blown pack spoilage was significantly (p < 0.01) increased using Auranta FV and sodium octanoate (caprylic acid sodium salt) at both concentrations. Moreover, sodium octanoate packs had significantly (p < 0.01) delayed blown pack spoilage as compared to Auranta FV. It was therefore concluded that Auranta FV or sodium octanoate, incorporated into the packaging materials used for vacuum packaged beef, would inhibit blown pack spoilage and in the case of the latter, well beyond the 42 days storage period currently required for beef primals.

Original languageEnglish
Article number67
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalFoods
Volume6
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Active food packaging
  • Antimicrobials
  • Blown pack spoilage
  • C. estertheticum
  • Edible coatings
  • Gelatine films

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Controlling blown pack spoilage using anti-microbial packaging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this