Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Convergent validity between two fundamental movement skills assessment tools: the test of Gross Motor Development-3 and the Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: In response to China’s recent educational policies mandating a focus on fundamental movement skills (FMS) in school physical education, this study investigated the convergent validity between two widely used FMS assessment tools: the Test of Gross Motor Development-3 (TGMD-3) and the Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA). Methods: A random sample of 134 9–10-year-old children were tested with both the CAMSA and the TGMD-3. Results: The outcomes from both the TGMD-3 and the CAMSA revealed a superiority in object-control skills among boys compared to girls, with a significant correlation between the two (r = 0.265–0.482, p < 0.01). Additionally, the Kappa correlation coefficient between the CAMSA and the TGMD-3 was 0.395, while the Kappa correlation coefficient between the CAMSA total skill and the TGMD-3 was 0.654. Conclusions: Both assessment tools effectively identified gender disparities in FMS, demonstrating correlation and consistency within acceptable ranges. Considering the slight variations in scoring methods, it is recommended to employ a variety of assessment tools in future evaluations of children’s FMS to enhance the overall comprehensiveness of the assessment. 
Original languageEnglish
Article number578
Number of pages15
JournalEducation Sciences
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2026

Keywords

  • assessment tools
  • CAMSA
  • convergent validity
  • fundamental movement skills
  • TGMD-3
  • [Education]

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Convergent validity between two fundamental movement skills assessment tools: the test of Gross Motor Development-3 and the Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this