TY - JOUR
T1 - Corporal punishment and reporting to child protection authorities
T2 - An empirical study of population attitudes in five European countries
AU - Burns, Kenneth
AU - Helland, Hege Stein
AU - Križ, Katrin
AU - Sánchez-Cabezudo, Sagrario Segado
AU - Skivenes, Marit
AU - Strömpl, Judit
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s)
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - This study, which draws upon representative survey data of the populations of Austria (n = 1000), Estonia (n = 1069), Ireland (n = 1000), Norway (n = 1002) and Spain (n = 1000), compares population attitudes towards corporal punishment (CP) and whether citizens would report corporal punishment to the child protection authorities. We found significant cross-country differences in attitudes towards CP, but only small differences between countries in attitudes towards reporting it. The most interesting and puzzling finding was the mismatch between attitudes towards CP and attitudes towards reporting it: almost one third of individuals who reject CP would not report it, and a quarter of those accepting CP would report it. We discuss whether the observed mismatches are due to perceptions that the CP we described does not meet a threshold to require state intervention, and whether knowledge about bans of CP and/or moral obligations to report CP has impact. Furthermore, we discuss the role of populations’ confidence in the state and populations’ trust in the ability and competency of the child protection authorities to improve a child's life.
AB - This study, which draws upon representative survey data of the populations of Austria (n = 1000), Estonia (n = 1069), Ireland (n = 1000), Norway (n = 1002) and Spain (n = 1000), compares population attitudes towards corporal punishment (CP) and whether citizens would report corporal punishment to the child protection authorities. We found significant cross-country differences in attitudes towards CP, but only small differences between countries in attitudes towards reporting it. The most interesting and puzzling finding was the mismatch between attitudes towards CP and attitudes towards reporting it: almost one third of individuals who reject CP would not report it, and a quarter of those accepting CP would report it. We discuss whether the observed mismatches are due to perceptions that the CP we described does not meet a threshold to require state intervention, and whether knowledge about bans of CP and/or moral obligations to report CP has impact. Furthermore, we discuss the role of populations’ confidence in the state and populations’ trust in the ability and competency of the child protection authorities to improve a child's life.
KW - Confidence
KW - Corporal punishment
KW - Cross-country comparison
KW - Reporting to child protection authorities
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85097527167
U2 - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105749
DO - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105749
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85097527167
SN - 0190-7409
VL - 120
JO - Children and Youth Services Review
JF - Children and Youth Services Review
M1 - 105749
ER -