Correction: Radiomics-based prediction of FIGO grade for placenta accreta spectrum (European Radiology Experimental, (2023), 7, 1, (54), 10.1186/s41747-023-00369-2)

The original article [1] contains numerical errors in Table 1. (Table presented.) Participant demographics and clinical outcome FIGO grade 1–2 (n = 18) FIGO grade 3 (n = 23) Age (years) 36.0 (34.0–39.75) 39.0 (37.2–42.7) Body mass index (kg/m2) 25.2 (23.4–29.3) 25.7 (23.0–30.1) Parity 2 (1–3) 2 (1–2.5) No of previous Caesarean section 1 (1–2) 2 (1–3) Gestation at MRI (weeks + days) 29 + 0 (27 + 2 − 32 + 3) 28 + 1 (27 + 0–31 + 0) Placental location on MRI, n (%) Placenta previa 18 (100.0) 22 (95.6) 16 (88.0) 22 (95.6) 2 (12.0) 0 (0.0) Elective delivery, n (%) 13 (72.0) 17 (73.0) Estimated blood loss (mL) 1,100 (735–3,250) 1,600 (1,100–5,800) Red cell concentrate transfusion, n (%) 6 (33.3) 10 (43.5) Surgical outcome Caesarean hysterectomy, n (%) 7 (38.9) 22 (95.7) Uterine conservationa (%) 11 (61.6) 1 (4.3) FIGO histological grade, n (%) 1 4 (22.2) 0 (0.0) 2 14 (77.8) 0 (0.0) 3 0 (0.0) 23 (100) Data are given in median (interquartile interval) unless otherwise stated aUterine conservation for the PAS group were cases who underwent myometrial resection FIGO International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics In the row "Elective delivery, n (%)", the respective cells state '30 (75)' and '7 (100)'. They should instead respectively state '13 (72.0)' and '17 (73.0)' as shown in Table 1 of this Correction article.