Correction: Radiomics-based prediction of FIGO grade for placenta accreta spectrum (European Radiology Experimental, (2023), 7, 1, (54), 10.1186/s41747-023-00369-2)

Helena C. Bartels; Jim O’Doherty; Eric Wolsztynski; David P. Brophy; Roisin MacDermott; David Atallah; Souha Saliba; Constance Young; Paul Downey; Jennifer Donnelly; Tony Geoghegan; Donal J. Brennan; Kathleen M. Curran

doi:10.1186/s41747-023-00397-y

Correction: Radiomics-based prediction of FIGO grade for placenta accreta spectrum (European Radiology Experimental, (2023), 7, 1, (54), 10.1186/s41747-023-00369-2)

Helena C. Bartels
, Jim O’Doherty
, Eric Wolsztynski
, David P. Brophy
, Roisin MacDermott
, David Atallah
, Souha Saliba
, Constance Young
, Paul Downey
, Jennifer Donnelly
, Tony Geoghegan
, Donal J. Brennan
, Kathleen M. Curran

University College Dublin
Siemens
Medical University of South Carolina
Insight Centre for Data Analytics
Hotel Dieu De France
National Maternity Hospital
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Debate

Abstract

The original article [1] contains numerical errors in Table 1. (Table presented.) Participant demographics and clinical outcome FIGO grade 1–2 (n = 18) FIGO grade 3 (n = 23) Age (years) 36.0 (34.0–39.75) 39.0 (37.2–42.7) Body mass index (kg/m²) 25.2 (23.4–29.3) 25.7 (23.0–30.1) Parity 2 (1–3) 2 (1–2.5) No of previous Caesarean section 1 (1–2) 2 (1–3) Gestation at MRI (weeks + days) 29 + 0 (27 + 2 − 32 + 3) 28 + 1 (27 + 0–31 + 0) Placental location on MRI, n (%) Placenta previa 18 (100.0) 22 (95.6) 16 (88.0) 22 (95.6) 2 (12.0) 0 (0.0) Elective delivery, n (%) 13 (72.0) 17 (73.0) Estimated blood loss (mL) 1,100 (735–3,250) 1,600 (1,100–5,800) Red cell concentrate transfusion, n (%) 6 (33.3) 10 (43.5) Surgical outcome Caesarean hysterectomy, n (%) 7 (38.9) 22 (95.7) Uterine conservation^a (%) 11 (61.6) 1 (4.3) FIGO histological grade, n (%) 1 4 (22.2) 0 (0.0) 2 14 (77.8) 0 (0.0) 3 0 (0.0) 23 (100) Data are given in median (interquartile interval) unless otherwise stated ^aUterine conservation for the PAS group were cases who underwent myometrial resection FIGO International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics In the row "Elective delivery, n (%)", the respective cells state '30 (75)' and '7 (100)'. They should instead respectively state '13 (72.0)' and '17 (73.0)' as shown in Table 1 of this Correction article.

Original language	English
Article number	73
Journal	European Radiology Experimental
Volume	7
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-023-00397-y
Publication status	Published - Dec 2023

Access to Document

10.1186/s41747-023-00397-y

Cite this

Bartels, H. C., O’Doherty, J., Wolsztynski, E., Brophy, D. P., MacDermott, R., Atallah, D., Saliba, S., Young, C., Downey, P., Donnelly, J., Geoghegan, T., Brennan, D. J., & Curran, K. M. (2023). Correction: Radiomics-based prediction of FIGO grade for placenta accreta spectrum (European Radiology Experimental, (2023), 7, 1, (54), 10.1186/s41747-023-00369-2). European Radiology Experimental, 7(1), Article 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-023-00397-y

@article{67b7248bc2ac4d4397851de1504eddb1,

title = "Correction: Radiomics-based prediction of FIGO grade for placenta accreta spectrum (European Radiology Experimental, (2023), 7, 1, (54), 10.1186/s41747-023-00369-2)",

abstract = "The original article [1] contains numerical errors in Table 1. (Table presented.) Participant demographics and clinical outcome FIGO grade 1–2 (n = 18) FIGO grade 3 (n = 23) Age (years) 36.0 (34.0–39.75) 39.0 (37.2–42.7) Body mass index (kg/m2) 25.2 (23.4–29.3) 25.7 (23.0–30.1) Parity 2 (1–3) 2 (1–2.5) No of previous Caesarean section 1 (1–2) 2 (1–3) Gestation at MRI (weeks + days) 29 + 0 (27 + 2 − 32 + 3) 28 + 1 (27 + 0–31 + 0) Placental location on MRI, n (\%) Placenta previa 18 (100.0) 22 (95.6) 16 (88.0) 22 (95.6) 2 (12.0) 0 (0.0) Elective delivery, n (\%) 13 (72.0) 17 (73.0) Estimated blood loss (mL) 1,100 (735–3,250) 1,600 (1,100–5,800) Red cell concentrate transfusion, n (\%) 6 (33.3) 10 (43.5) Surgical outcome Caesarean hysterectomy, n (\%) 7 (38.9) 22 (95.7) Uterine conservationa (\%) 11 (61.6) 1 (4.3) FIGO histological grade, n (\%) 1 4 (22.2) 0 (0.0) 2 14 (77.8) 0 (0.0) 3 0 (0.0) 23 (100) Data are given in median (interquartile interval) unless otherwise stated aUterine conservation for the PAS group were cases who underwent myometrial resection FIGO International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics In the row {"}Elective delivery, n (\%){"}, the respective cells state '30 (75)' and '7 (100)'. They should instead respectively state '13 (72.0)' and '17 (73.0)' as shown in Table 1 of this Correction article.",

author = "Bartels, \{Helena C.\} and Jim O{\textquoteright}Doherty and Eric Wolsztynski and Brophy, \{David P.\} and Roisin MacDermott and David Atallah and Souha Saliba and Constance Young and Paul Downey and Jennifer Donnelly and Tony Geoghegan and Brennan, \{Donal J.\} and Curran, \{Kathleen M.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023, The Author(s).",

year = "2023",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1186/s41747-023-00397-y",

language = "English",

volume = "7",

journal = "European Radiology Experimental",

issn = "2509-9280",

publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH",

number = "1",

}

Bartels, HC, O’Doherty, J, Wolsztynski, E, Brophy, DP, MacDermott, R, Atallah, D, Saliba, S, Young, C, Downey, P, Donnelly, J, Geoghegan, T, Brennan, DJ & Curran, KM 2023, 'Correction: Radiomics-based prediction of FIGO grade for placenta accreta spectrum (European Radiology Experimental, (2023), 7, 1, (54), 10.1186/s41747-023-00369-2)', European Radiology Experimental, vol. 7, no. 1, 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-023-00397-y

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction

T2 - Radiomics-based prediction of FIGO grade for placenta accreta spectrum (European Radiology Experimental, (2023), 7, 1, (54), 10.1186/s41747-023-00369-2)

AU - Bartels, Helena C.

AU - O’Doherty, Jim

AU - Wolsztynski, Eric

AU - Brophy, David P.

AU - MacDermott, Roisin

AU - Atallah, David

AU - Saliba, Souha

AU - Young, Constance

AU - Downey, Paul

AU - Donnelly, Jennifer

AU - Geoghegan, Tony

AU - Brennan, Donal J.

AU - Curran, Kathleen M.

PY - 2023/12

Y1 - 2023/12

N2 - The original article [1] contains numerical errors in Table 1. (Table presented.) Participant demographics and clinical outcome FIGO grade 1–2 (n = 18) FIGO grade 3 (n = 23) Age (years) 36.0 (34.0–39.75) 39.0 (37.2–42.7) Body mass index (kg/m2) 25.2 (23.4–29.3) 25.7 (23.0–30.1) Parity 2 (1–3) 2 (1–2.5) No of previous Caesarean section 1 (1–2) 2 (1–3) Gestation at MRI (weeks + days) 29 + 0 (27 + 2 − 32 + 3) 28 + 1 (27 + 0–31 + 0) Placental location on MRI, n (%) Placenta previa 18 (100.0) 22 (95.6) 16 (88.0) 22 (95.6) 2 (12.0) 0 (0.0) Elective delivery, n (%) 13 (72.0) 17 (73.0) Estimated blood loss (mL) 1,100 (735–3,250) 1,600 (1,100–5,800) Red cell concentrate transfusion, n (%) 6 (33.3) 10 (43.5) Surgical outcome Caesarean hysterectomy, n (%) 7 (38.9) 22 (95.7) Uterine conservationa (%) 11 (61.6) 1 (4.3) FIGO histological grade, n (%) 1 4 (22.2) 0 (0.0) 2 14 (77.8) 0 (0.0) 3 0 (0.0) 23 (100) Data are given in median (interquartile interval) unless otherwise stated aUterine conservation for the PAS group were cases who underwent myometrial resection FIGO International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics In the row "Elective delivery, n (%)", the respective cells state '30 (75)' and '7 (100)'. They should instead respectively state '13 (72.0)' and '17 (73.0)' as shown in Table 1 of this Correction article.

AB - The original article [1] contains numerical errors in Table 1. (Table presented.) Participant demographics and clinical outcome FIGO grade 1–2 (n = 18) FIGO grade 3 (n = 23) Age (years) 36.0 (34.0–39.75) 39.0 (37.2–42.7) Body mass index (kg/m2) 25.2 (23.4–29.3) 25.7 (23.0–30.1) Parity 2 (1–3) 2 (1–2.5) No of previous Caesarean section 1 (1–2) 2 (1–3) Gestation at MRI (weeks + days) 29 + 0 (27 + 2 − 32 + 3) 28 + 1 (27 + 0–31 + 0) Placental location on MRI, n (%) Placenta previa 18 (100.0) 22 (95.6) 16 (88.0) 22 (95.6) 2 (12.0) 0 (0.0) Elective delivery, n (%) 13 (72.0) 17 (73.0) Estimated blood loss (mL) 1,100 (735–3,250) 1,600 (1,100–5,800) Red cell concentrate transfusion, n (%) 6 (33.3) 10 (43.5) Surgical outcome Caesarean hysterectomy, n (%) 7 (38.9) 22 (95.7) Uterine conservationa (%) 11 (61.6) 1 (4.3) FIGO histological grade, n (%) 1 4 (22.2) 0 (0.0) 2 14 (77.8) 0 (0.0) 3 0 (0.0) 23 (100) Data are given in median (interquartile interval) unless otherwise stated aUterine conservation for the PAS group were cases who underwent myometrial resection FIGO International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics In the row "Elective delivery, n (%)", the respective cells state '30 (75)' and '7 (100)'. They should instead respectively state '13 (72.0)' and '17 (73.0)' as shown in Table 1 of this Correction article.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85177462895

U2 - 10.1186/s41747-023-00397-y

DO - 10.1186/s41747-023-00397-y

M3 - Comment/Debate

C2 - 37991638

AN - SCOPUS:85177462895

SN - 2509-9280

VL - 7

JO - European Radiology Experimental

JF - European Radiology Experimental

IS - 1

M1 - 73

ER -

Correction: Radiomics-based prediction of FIGO grade for placenta accreta spectrum (European Radiology Experimental, (2023), 7, 1, (54), 10.1186/s41747-023-00369-2)

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this