Debriefing works: Successful retraction of misinformation following a fake news study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In recent years there has been an explosion of research on misinformation, often involving experiments where participants are presented with fake news stories and subsequently debriefed. In order to avoid potential harm to participants or society, it is imperative that we establish whether debriefing procedures remove any lasting influence of misinformation. In the current study, we followed up with 1547 participants one week after they had been exposed to fake news stories about COVID-19 and then provided with a detailed debriefing. False memories and beliefs for previously-seen fake stories declined from the original study, suggesting that the debrief was effective. Moreover, the debriefing resulted in reduced false memories and beliefs for novel fake stories, suggesting a broader impact on participants' willingness to accept misinformation. Small effects of misinformation on planned health behaviours observed in the original study were also eliminated at follow-up. Our findings suggest that when a careful and thorough debriefing procedure is followed, researchers can safely and ethically conduct misinformation research on sensitive topics.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0280295
JournalPLOS ONE
Volume18
Issue number1 January
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Debriefing works: Successful retraction of misinformation following a fake news study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this