TY - JOUR
T1 - Decoration of the in principio initials in early insular manuscripts
T2 - Christ as a visible image of the invisible god
AU - Krasnodębska-D'aughton, Małgorzata
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - The Christological hymn in the Epistle to the Colossians names Christ as the only image of the invisible God, Qui est imago Dei invisibilis (Col. I: 15). This Pauline verse frequently employed by patristic writers was used as the epitome of an iconoclastic view, but it also served as both inspiration and theological justification for Christian art.1 St Paul developed his concept of Christ as the image not only in conjunction with the Genesis account of the creation ofman (Gen. I: 26), but also in relation to the reformation of fallen man back into the image of God (Rom. 8: 29, I Cor. 15: 48–49, II Cor. 3: 18. II Cor. 4: 4).2 In his Epistles he masterfully centred such crucial biblical themes as the creation and fall of man, the Incarnation of Christ as well as the restoration of man to divine grace around a lesson on the imago. The Pauline fusion of these themes established the imago as a complex and multi-layered concept and allowed later exegetes to view the image through a chain of biblical texts. To this chain some commentators added the idea of the visible as the image of something invisible, and their list often ended up with the artistic image;3 consequently everything was perceived as an image or a dark glass (cf I Cor. 13: 12) through which one glimpsed the divine.4 Following in the steps of the patristic exegetes, Insular writers developed their theology of the imago. Amongst these Insular writers, Bede (c. 673–735) and Columbanus (c. 543–615) were aware that the concept of the image bears in itself a multiplicity of connotations which included biblical and artistic meanings.5.
AB - The Christological hymn in the Epistle to the Colossians names Christ as the only image of the invisible God, Qui est imago Dei invisibilis (Col. I: 15). This Pauline verse frequently employed by patristic writers was used as the epitome of an iconoclastic view, but it also served as both inspiration and theological justification for Christian art.1 St Paul developed his concept of Christ as the image not only in conjunction with the Genesis account of the creation ofman (Gen. I: 26), but also in relation to the reformation of fallen man back into the image of God (Rom. 8: 29, I Cor. 15: 48–49, II Cor. 3: 18. II Cor. 4: 4).2 In his Epistles he masterfully centred such crucial biblical themes as the creation and fall of man, the Incarnation of Christ as well as the restoration of man to divine grace around a lesson on the imago. The Pauline fusion of these themes established the imago as a complex and multi-layered concept and allowed later exegetes to view the image through a chain of biblical texts. To this chain some commentators added the idea of the visible as the image of something invisible, and their list often ended up with the artistic image;3 consequently everything was perceived as an image or a dark glass (cf I Cor. 13: 12) through which one glimpsed the divine.4 Following in the steps of the patristic exegetes, Insular writers developed their theology of the imago. Amongst these Insular writers, Bede (c. 673–735) and Columbanus (c. 543–615) were aware that the concept of the image bears in itself a multiplicity of connotations which included biblical and artistic meanings.5.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/61949305482
U2 - 10.1080/02666286.2002.10404981
DO - 10.1080/02666286.2002.10404981
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:61949305482
SN - 0266-6286
VL - 18
SP - 105
EP - 122
JO - Word and Image
JF - Word and Image
IS - 3
ER -