Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Defining Minimum Treatment Parameters of Ablative Radiation Therapy in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Expert Consensus

  • Ted K. Yanagihara
  • , Joel E. Tepper
  • , Andrew M. Moon
  • , Aisling Barry
  • , Meritxell Molla
  • , Jinsil Seong
  • , Ferran Torres
  • , Smith Apisarnthanarax
  • , Michael Buckstein
  • , Higinia Cardenes
  • , Daniel T. Chang
  • , Mary Feng
  • , Chandan Guha
  • , Christopher L. Hallemeier
  • , Maria A. Hawkins
  • , Morten Hoyer
  • , Hiromitsu Iwata
  • , Salma K. Jabbour
  • , Lisa Kachnic
  • , Jordan Kharofa
  • Tae Hyun Kim, Alexander Kirichenko, Eugene J. Koay, Hirokazu Makishima, Joel Mases, Jeffrey J. Meyer, Pablo Munoz-Schuffenegger, Dawn Owen, Hee Chul Park, Jordi Saez, Nina N. Sanford, Marta Scorsetti, Grace L. Smith, Jennifer Y. Wo, Sang Min Yoon, Theodore S. Lawrence, Maria Reig, Laura A. Dawson
  • Delphi Research Labs
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
  • Yonsei University
  • Autonomous University of Barcelona
  • University of Washington
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Cornell University
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • University College London
  • Aarhus University
  • Nagoya Proton Therapy Center
  • Department of Neuroscience and Cell Biology
  • Columbia University
  • University of Cincinnati
  • National Cancer Center Korea
  • West Penn Allegheny Health System
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • University of Tsukuba
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
  • Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan university
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas - Rozzano (Milano)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • University of Ulsan
  • University of Barcelona
  • University Health Network

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is a highly effective treatment in select patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer system does not recommend the use of EBRT in HCC due to a lack of sufficient evidence and intends to perform an individual patient level meta-analysis of ablative EBRT in this population. However, there are many types of EBRT described in the literature with no formal definition of what constitutes “ablative.” Thus, we convened a group of international experts to provide consensus on the parameters that define ablative EBRT in HCC. Methods and Materials: Fundamental parameters related to dose, fractionation, radiobiology, target identification, and delivery technique were identified by a steering committee to generate 7 Key Criteria (KC) that would define ablative EBRT for HCC. Using a modified Delphi (mDelphi) method, experts in the use of EBRT in the treatment of HCC were surveyed. Respondents were given 30 days to respond in round 1 of the mDelphi and 14 days to respond in round 2. A threshold of ≥70% was used to define consensus for answers to each KC. Results: Of 40 invitations extended, 35 (88%) returned responses. In the first round, 3 of 7 KC reached consensus. In the second round, 100% returned responses and consensus was reached in 3 of the remaining 4 KC. The distribution of answers for one KC, which queried the a/b ratio of HCC, was such that consensus was not achieved. Based on this analysis, ablative EBRT for HCC was defined as a BED10 ≥80 Gy with daily imaging and multiphasic contrast used for target delineation. Treatment breaks (eg, for adaptive EBRT) are allowed, but the total treatment time should be ≤6 weeks. Equivalent dose when treating with protons should use a conversion factor of 1.1, but there is no single conversion factor for carbon ions. Conclusions: Using a mDelphi method assessing expert opinion, we provide the first consensus definition of ablative EBRT for HCC. Empirical data are required to define the a/b of HCC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)134-145
Number of pages12
JournalPractical Radiation Oncology
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Defining Minimum Treatment Parameters of Ablative Radiation Therapy in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Expert Consensus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this