TY - JOUR
T1 - Design and assessment of protein-fortified recipes for community-dwelling older adults to prevent the onset of undernutrition
AU - Geny, Alexia
AU - Koga, Shiori
AU - Smith, Rachel
AU - Rognså, Guro Helgesdotter
AU - Brasse, Céline
AU - Grini, Ida Synnøve
AU - Maître, Isabelle
AU - Feron, Gilles
AU - Clegg, Miriam
AU - Methven, Lisa
AU - Ueland, Øydis
AU - Wymelbeke-Delannoy, Virginie Van
AU - Sulmont-Rossé, Claire
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - Introduction: Public health guidelines recommend food fortification (adding ingredients of nutritional importance into commonly consumed foods) to help older adults achieve sufficient protein intake. Despite the nutritional benefits of food fortification, there is a significant gap between nutritional research and sensory acceptance, which can limit older adults’ compliance to fortified foods. The present study aimed at developing and testing the feasibility and liking of using “Do it yourself” protein-fortified recipes that could be easily prepared at home in France, Norway and the UK. Materials and methods: A market review was conducted to identify available high-protein ingredients (n = 140). After screening for sensory, nutritional, food technology, and regulatory characteristics, two high-protein ingredients were selected: milk protein powder (isolate) and organic soya mince (extruded). In parallel, common food matrices that could serve as relevant candidates for fortification were identified through 4-day food diaries collected with 65 respondents in France, Norway, and the UK. Eight dishes were selected for recipe fortification and paired with high-protein ingredients (+ 6 to 11 g of protein per portion, mean = 8.1, SD = 2.3). Then, these fortified recipes were assessed for ease-of-use and acceptability in a home-use trial with healthy older adults in the three countries (> 70 years; n = 158). Participants made the recipes themselves at home using their own cooking equipment. Results: Feedback from participants indicated that they found the recipes easy to follow and to prepare themselves. The fortified recipes were liked (mean liking from 5.3 to 5.9 on a 7-point scale) and perceived as being easy to chew, moisten (humidify in mouth) and swallow. More than 50% of the participants were willing to make the recipes again in the future and liked the fortified version equally or more to their usual recipes. Discussion: Making the recipes by themselves at home removed participants’ barriers to using high-protein ingredients. Furthermore, participants modified dishes to their liking by adjusting seasoning and texture to their preference underling the flexibility of the fortification strategy.
AB - Introduction: Public health guidelines recommend food fortification (adding ingredients of nutritional importance into commonly consumed foods) to help older adults achieve sufficient protein intake. Despite the nutritional benefits of food fortification, there is a significant gap between nutritional research and sensory acceptance, which can limit older adults’ compliance to fortified foods. The present study aimed at developing and testing the feasibility and liking of using “Do it yourself” protein-fortified recipes that could be easily prepared at home in France, Norway and the UK. Materials and methods: A market review was conducted to identify available high-protein ingredients (n = 140). After screening for sensory, nutritional, food technology, and regulatory characteristics, two high-protein ingredients were selected: milk protein powder (isolate) and organic soya mince (extruded). In parallel, common food matrices that could serve as relevant candidates for fortification were identified through 4-day food diaries collected with 65 respondents in France, Norway, and the UK. Eight dishes were selected for recipe fortification and paired with high-protein ingredients (+ 6 to 11 g of protein per portion, mean = 8.1, SD = 2.3). Then, these fortified recipes were assessed for ease-of-use and acceptability in a home-use trial with healthy older adults in the three countries (> 70 years; n = 158). Participants made the recipes themselves at home using their own cooking equipment. Results: Feedback from participants indicated that they found the recipes easy to follow and to prepare themselves. The fortified recipes were liked (mean liking from 5.3 to 5.9 on a 7-point scale) and perceived as being easy to chew, moisten (humidify in mouth) and swallow. More than 50% of the participants were willing to make the recipes again in the future and liked the fortified version equally or more to their usual recipes. Discussion: Making the recipes by themselves at home removed participants’ barriers to using high-protein ingredients. Furthermore, participants modified dishes to their liking by adjusting seasoning and texture to their preference underling the flexibility of the fortification strategy.
KW - Aging
KW - Co-creation
KW - Enrichment
KW - Feasibility
KW - Food
KW - Fortification
KW - Liking
KW - Malnutrition
KW - Older adults
KW - Protein
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85214867330
U2 - 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115558
DO - 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115558
M3 - Article
C2 - 39967130
AN - SCOPUS:85214867330
SN - 0963-9969
VL - 202
JO - Food Research International
JF - Food Research International
M1 - 115558
ER -