TY - JOUR
T1 - Detection of 'EEG bursts' in the early preterm EEG
T2 - Visual vs. automated detection
AU - Palmu, Kirsi
AU - Wikström, Sverre
AU - Hippeläinen, Eero
AU - Boylan, Geraldine
AU - Hellström-Westas, Lena
AU - Vanhatalo, Sampsa
PY - 2010/7
Y1 - 2010/7
N2 - Objective: To describe the characteristics of activity bursts in the early preterm EEG, to assess inter-rater agreement of burst detection by visual inspection, and to determine the performance of an automated burst detector that uses non-linear energy operator (NLEO). Methods: EEG recordings from extremely preterm (n = 12) and very preterm (n = 6) infants were analysed. Three neurophysiologists independently marked bursts in the EEG, the characteristics of bursts were analyzed and inter-rater agreement determined. Unanimous detections were used as the gold standard in estimating the performance of an automated burst detector. In addition, some details of this automated detector were revised in an attempt to improve performance. Results: Overall, inter-rater agreement was 86% for extremely preterm infants and 81% for very preterm infants. In visual markings, bursts had variable lengths (∼1-10 s) and increased amplitudes (and power) throughout the frequency spectrum. Accuracy of the original detection algorithm was 87% and 79% and accuracy of the revised algorithm 93% and 87% for extremely preterm and very preterm babies, respectively. Conclusion: Visual detection of bursts from the early preterm EEG is comparable albeit not identical between raters. The original automated detector underestimates the amount of burst occurrence, but can be readily improved to yield results comparable to visual detection. Further clinical studies are warranted to assess the optimal descriptors of burst detection for monitoring and prognostication. Significance: Validation of a burst detector offers an evidence-based platform for further development of brain monitors in very preterm babies.
AB - Objective: To describe the characteristics of activity bursts in the early preterm EEG, to assess inter-rater agreement of burst detection by visual inspection, and to determine the performance of an automated burst detector that uses non-linear energy operator (NLEO). Methods: EEG recordings from extremely preterm (n = 12) and very preterm (n = 6) infants were analysed. Three neurophysiologists independently marked bursts in the EEG, the characteristics of bursts were analyzed and inter-rater agreement determined. Unanimous detections were used as the gold standard in estimating the performance of an automated burst detector. In addition, some details of this automated detector were revised in an attempt to improve performance. Results: Overall, inter-rater agreement was 86% for extremely preterm infants and 81% for very preterm infants. In visual markings, bursts had variable lengths (∼1-10 s) and increased amplitudes (and power) throughout the frequency spectrum. Accuracy of the original detection algorithm was 87% and 79% and accuracy of the revised algorithm 93% and 87% for extremely preterm and very preterm babies, respectively. Conclusion: Visual detection of bursts from the early preterm EEG is comparable albeit not identical between raters. The original automated detector underestimates the amount of burst occurrence, but can be readily improved to yield results comparable to visual detection. Further clinical studies are warranted to assess the optimal descriptors of burst detection for monitoring and prognostication. Significance: Validation of a burst detector offers an evidence-based platform for further development of brain monitors in very preterm babies.
KW - Brain monitoring
KW - Neonatal EEG
KW - Neonatal intensive care unit
KW - Premature EEG
KW - SAT
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/77952741790
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.02.010
DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.02.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 20395172
AN - SCOPUS:77952741790
SN - 1388-2457
VL - 121
SP - 1015
EP - 1022
JO - Clinical Neurophysiology
JF - Clinical Neurophysiology
IS - 7
ER -