TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing consensus on priorities for preconception care in the general practice setting in the UK
T2 - Study protocol
AU - Schoenaker, Danielle
AU - Lovegrove, Elizabeth
AU - Santer, Miriam
AU - Matvienko-Sikar, Karen
AU - Carr, Helen
AU - Alwan, Nisreen A.
AU - Kubelabo, Laura
AU - Davies, Nathan
AU - Godfrey, Keith M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright: © 2024 Schoenaker et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - Background Preconception medical, behavioural and socioeconomic risk factors are common among people of reproductive age and can impact pregnancy and offspring outcomes. In line with clinical guidance, primary care practitioners are encouraged to support patients to manage and optimise their health prior to pregnancy. Due to barriers, including lack of time and resources, this support is not currently part of routine practice. Aim As a first step towards the co-development of practical and realistic best practice guidance, this study aims to achieve consensus on a list of priority risk factors that can be used in general practice to guide opportunistic preconception care for patients of reproductive age. Methods This study protocol was developed with a Public Advisory Group of people of reproductive age, researchers and primary care practitioners. The consensus study will consist of three steps: 1) identifying an initial long-list of candidate risk factors and defining principles for scoring the importance of each risk factor, through a literature review, workshops with people of reproductive age, and interviews with primary care practitioners; 2) stakeholder partic ipant prioritisation of each candidate risk factor for its importance for preconception care through a three-round eDelphi survey; and 3) agreeing on the final priority list through consensus meetings with a selected group of stakeholders. Participants living in the UK will be recruited across two stakeholder groups: people of reproductive age (through the Public Advisory Group and charities) and primary care professionals (through professional organisations). Ethical approval This study has been approved by the University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee (ERGO 83699 and 92950). Dissemination All study findings will be shared through stakeholder participants, peer-reviewed publication, lay summary, meetings and conference presentations, and relevant professional and community organisations. Ongoing research will inform implementation of the priority list in clinical practice.
AB - Background Preconception medical, behavioural and socioeconomic risk factors are common among people of reproductive age and can impact pregnancy and offspring outcomes. In line with clinical guidance, primary care practitioners are encouraged to support patients to manage and optimise their health prior to pregnancy. Due to barriers, including lack of time and resources, this support is not currently part of routine practice. Aim As a first step towards the co-development of practical and realistic best practice guidance, this study aims to achieve consensus on a list of priority risk factors that can be used in general practice to guide opportunistic preconception care for patients of reproductive age. Methods This study protocol was developed with a Public Advisory Group of people of reproductive age, researchers and primary care practitioners. The consensus study will consist of three steps: 1) identifying an initial long-list of candidate risk factors and defining principles for scoring the importance of each risk factor, through a literature review, workshops with people of reproductive age, and interviews with primary care practitioners; 2) stakeholder partic ipant prioritisation of each candidate risk factor for its importance for preconception care through a three-round eDelphi survey; and 3) agreeing on the final priority list through consensus meetings with a selected group of stakeholders. Participants living in the UK will be recruited across two stakeholder groups: people of reproductive age (through the Public Advisory Group and charities) and primary care professionals (through professional organisations). Ethical approval This study has been approved by the University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee (ERGO 83699 and 92950). Dissemination All study findings will be shared through stakeholder participants, peer-reviewed publication, lay summary, meetings and conference presentations, and relevant professional and community organisations. Ongoing research will inform implementation of the priority list in clinical practice.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85209920793
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0311578
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0311578
M3 - Article
C2 - 39570956
AN - SCOPUS:85209920793
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 19
JO - PLOS ONE
JF - PLOS ONE
IS - 11 November
M1 - e0311578
ER -