TY - CHAP
T1 - Development of a Personalized Anomaly Detection Model to Detect Motion Artifacts Over PPG Data Using Catch22 Features
AU - Valerio, Andrea
AU - Demarchi, Danilo
AU - O'Flynn, Brendan
AU - Tedesco, Salvatore
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - As remote health monitoring grows, it's crucial to distinguish high-quality biomedical signals from low-quality ones. Identifying and mitigating motion artifacts (MAs) is essential for accurate data from wearable devices. Methods: In this work, a high-performing subset of time-series features denoted as catch22 (22 CAnonical Time-series CHaracteristics) was used to detect the presence of MAs in photoplethysmogram (PPG) data acquired from the brachial and digital artery of 31 healthy subjects. Three unsupervised algorithms were employed along with catch22 to detect MAs within the dataset, these were: One-Class Support Vector Machine, Isolation Forest, and Local Outlier Factor. Results: Aggregated precision, recall, and F1-score were computed per each method to assess the detection performances according to a variety of features and anomalies' distribution. These metrics resulted respectively equal to 0.5, 0.64, and 0.55 for OC- SVM, 0.91, 0.94, and 0.92 for IF, and 0.74, 0.75, and 0.74 for LOF. Conclusion: Experimental findings illustrate that by employing the catch22 feature subset, it is viable to discern the presence of MAs in beat-to-beat pulse waveforms without recurring to prior knowledge or data-driven PPG features.
AB - As remote health monitoring grows, it's crucial to distinguish high-quality biomedical signals from low-quality ones. Identifying and mitigating motion artifacts (MAs) is essential for accurate data from wearable devices. Methods: In this work, a high-performing subset of time-series features denoted as catch22 (22 CAnonical Time-series CHaracteristics) was used to detect the presence of MAs in photoplethysmogram (PPG) data acquired from the brachial and digital artery of 31 healthy subjects. Three unsupervised algorithms were employed along with catch22 to detect MAs within the dataset, these were: One-Class Support Vector Machine, Isolation Forest, and Local Outlier Factor. Results: Aggregated precision, recall, and F1-score were computed per each method to assess the detection performances according to a variety of features and anomalies' distribution. These metrics resulted respectively equal to 0.5, 0.64, and 0.55 for OC- SVM, 0.91, 0.94, and 0.92 for IF, and 0.74, 0.75, and 0.74 for LOF. Conclusion: Experimental findings illustrate that by employing the catch22 feature subset, it is viable to discern the presence of MAs in beat-to-beat pulse waveforms without recurring to prior knowledge or data-driven PPG features.
KW - Anomaly detection
KW - catch22
KW - Isolation forest
KW - PPG
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85215292371
U2 - 10.1109/SENSORS60989.2024.10785142
DO - 10.1109/SENSORS60989.2024.10785142
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85215292371
T3 - Proceedings of IEEE Sensors
BT - 2024 IEEE Sensors, SENSORS 2024 - Conference Proceedings
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2024 IEEE Sensors, SENSORS 2024
Y2 - 20 October 2024 through 23 October 2024
ER -