TY - JOUR
T1 - Digital intervention (Renewed) to support symptom management, wellbeing, and quality of life among cancer survivors in primary care: a randomised controlled trial
AU - Little, Paul
AU - Bradbury, Katherine
AU - Stuart, Beth
AU - Barnett, J.
AU - Krusche, Adele S.
AU - Steele, Mary
AU - Heber, Elena D.
AU - Easton, Stephanie
AU - Smith, Kirsten A.
AU - Slodkowska-Barabasz, Joanna
AU - Payne, Liz
AU - Corbett, Teresa
AU - Yao, Guiqing Lily
AU - Pollet, Sebastien
AU - Smith, Jazzine Kai
AU - Joseph, Judith
AU - Lawrence, Megan
AU - Böhning, Dankmar
AU - Cheetham-Blake, Tara
AU - Eccles, Diana
AU - Foster, Claire
AU - Geraghty, Adam
AU - Leydon, Geraldine
AU - Muller, Andre Matthias
AU - Neal, Richard D.
AU - Osborne, Richard
AU - Rathod, Shanaya
AU - Richardson, Alison
AU - Grimmett, Chloe
AU - Sharman, Geoffrey
AU - Bacon, Roger
AU - Turner, Lesley
AU - Stephens, Richard
AU - Burford, Tamsin
AU - Wilde, Laura
AU - Middleton, Karen
AU - Liddiard, Megan E
AU - Rogers, Kirsty L
AU - Raftery, James
AU - Zhu, Shihua
AU - Webley, Frances
AU - Griffiths, Gareth
AU - Nuttall, Jacqueline
AU - Chalder, Trudie
AU - Wilkinson, Clare
AU - Watson, Eila
AU - Yardley, Lucy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Royal College of General Practitioners. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/5
Y1 - 2025/5
N2 - Background: many cancer survivors following primary treatment have prolonged poor quality of life.
Aim: to determine the effectiveness of a bespoke digital intervention to support cancer survivors.
Design: Pragmatic parallel open randomised trial.
Setting: UK general practices.
Methods: people having finished primary treatment (<= 10 years previously) for colo-rectal, breast or prostate cancers, with European-Organization-for-Research-and-Treatment-of-Cancer QLQ-C30 score <85, were randomised by online software to: 1)detailed 'generic' digital NHS support ('LiveWell';n=906), 2) a bespoke complex digital intervention ('Renewed';n=903) addressing symptom management, physical activity, diet, weight loss, distress, or 3) 'Renewed-with-support' (n=903): 'Renewed' with additional brief email and telephone support.
Results: mixed linear regression provided estimates of the differences between each intervention group and generic advice: at 6 months (primary time point: n's respectively 806;749;705) all groups improved, with no significant between-group differences for EORTC QLQ-C30, but global health improved more in both intervention groups. By 12 months there were: small improvements in EORTC QLQ-C30 for Renewed-with-support (versus generic advice: 1.42, 95% CIs 0.33-2.51); both groups improved global health (12 months: renewed: 3.06, 1.39-4.74; renewed-with-support: 2.78, 1.08-4.48), dyspnoea, constipation, and enablement, and lower NHS costs (generic advice £265: in comparison respectively £141 (153-128) and £77 (90-65) lower); and for Renewed-with-support improvement in several other symptom subscales. No harms were identified.
Conclusion: cancer survivors quality of life improved with detailed generic online support. Robustly developed bespoke digital support provides limited additional short term benefit, but additional longer term improvement in global health enablement and symptom management, with substantially lower NHS costs.
AB - Background: many cancer survivors following primary treatment have prolonged poor quality of life.
Aim: to determine the effectiveness of a bespoke digital intervention to support cancer survivors.
Design: Pragmatic parallel open randomised trial.
Setting: UK general practices.
Methods: people having finished primary treatment (<= 10 years previously) for colo-rectal, breast or prostate cancers, with European-Organization-for-Research-and-Treatment-of-Cancer QLQ-C30 score <85, were randomised by online software to: 1)detailed 'generic' digital NHS support ('LiveWell';n=906), 2) a bespoke complex digital intervention ('Renewed';n=903) addressing symptom management, physical activity, diet, weight loss, distress, or 3) 'Renewed-with-support' (n=903): 'Renewed' with additional brief email and telephone support.
Results: mixed linear regression provided estimates of the differences between each intervention group and generic advice: at 6 months (primary time point: n's respectively 806;749;705) all groups improved, with no significant between-group differences for EORTC QLQ-C30, but global health improved more in both intervention groups. By 12 months there were: small improvements in EORTC QLQ-C30 for Renewed-with-support (versus generic advice: 1.42, 95% CIs 0.33-2.51); both groups improved global health (12 months: renewed: 3.06, 1.39-4.74; renewed-with-support: 2.78, 1.08-4.48), dyspnoea, constipation, and enablement, and lower NHS costs (generic advice £265: in comparison respectively £141 (153-128) and £77 (90-65) lower); and for Renewed-with-support improvement in several other symptom subscales. No harms were identified.
Conclusion: cancer survivors quality of life improved with detailed generic online support. Robustly developed bespoke digital support provides limited additional short term benefit, but additional longer term improvement in global health enablement and symptom management, with substantially lower NHS costs.
KW - cancer survivors
KW - health resources
KW - primary health care
KW - self-management
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105004199730
U2 - 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0262
DO - 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0262
M3 - Article
C2 - 38164562
SN - 0960-1643
VL - 75
SP - e357-e365
JO - British Journal of General Practice
JF - British Journal of General Practice
IS - 754
ER -