Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Digital intervention (Renewed) to support symptom management, wellbeing, and quality of life among cancer survivors in primary care: a randomised controlled trial

  • Paul Little
  • , Katherine Bradbury
  • , Beth Stuart
  • , J. Barnett
  • , Adele S. Krusche
  • , Mary Steele
  • , Elena D. Heber
  • , Stephanie Easton
  • , Kirsten A. Smith
  • , Joanna Slodkowska-Barabasz
  • , Liz Payne
  • , Teresa Corbett
  • , Guiqing Lily Yao
  • , Sebastien Pollet
  • , Jazzine Kai Smith
  • , Judith Joseph
  • , Megan Lawrence
  • , Dankmar Böhning
  • , Tara Cheetham-Blake
  • , Diana Eccles
  • Claire Foster, Adam Geraghty, Geraldine Leydon, Andre Matthias Muller, Richard D. Neal, Richard Osborne, Shanaya Rathod, Alison Richardson, Chloe Grimmett, Geoffrey Sharman, Roger Bacon, Lesley Turner, Richard Stephens, Tamsin Burford, Laura Wilde, Karen Middleton, Megan E Liddiard, Kirsty L Rogers, James Raftery, Shihua Zhu, Frances Webley, Gareth Griffiths, Jacqueline Nuttall, Trudie Chalder, Clare Wilkinson, Eila Watson, Lucy Yardley
  • University of Southampton

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Background: many cancer survivors following primary treatment have prolonged poor quality of life. Aim: to determine the effectiveness of a bespoke digital intervention to support cancer survivors. Design: Pragmatic parallel open randomised trial. Setting: UK general practices. Methods: people having finished primary treatment (<= 10 years previously) for colo-rectal, breast or prostate cancers, with European-Organization-for-Research-and-Treatment-of-Cancer QLQ-C30 score <85, were randomised by online software to: 1)detailed 'generic' digital NHS support ('LiveWell';n=906), 2) a bespoke complex digital intervention ('Renewed';n=903) addressing symptom management, physical activity, diet, weight loss, distress, or 3) 'Renewed-with-support' (n=903): 'Renewed' with additional brief email and telephone support. Results: mixed linear regression provided estimates of the differences between each intervention group and generic advice: at 6 months (primary time point: n's respectively 806;749;705) all groups improved, with no significant between-group differences for EORTC QLQ-C30, but global health improved more in both intervention groups. By 12 months there were: small improvements in EORTC QLQ-C30 for Renewed-with-support (versus generic advice: 1.42, 95% CIs 0.33-2.51); both groups improved global health (12 months: renewed: 3.06, 1.39-4.74; renewed-with-support: 2.78, 1.08-4.48), dyspnoea, constipation, and enablement, and lower NHS costs (generic advice £265: in comparison respectively £141 (153-128) and £77 (90-65) lower); and for Renewed-with-support improvement in several other symptom subscales. No harms were identified. Conclusion: cancer survivors quality of life improved with detailed generic online support. Robustly developed bespoke digital support provides limited additional short term benefit, but additional longer term improvement in global health enablement and symptom management, with substantially lower NHS costs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e357-e365
JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
Volume75
Issue number754
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2025
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • cancer survivors
  • health resources
  • primary health care
  • self-management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Digital intervention (Renewed) to support symptom management, wellbeing, and quality of life among cancer survivors in primary care: a randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this