Abstract
This paper’s main argument is that housing financialisation can be understood as a set of intertwined digital/material processes, and that resisting housing financialisation requires activism that recognises and capitalises on this dynamic. Drawing from Desiree Fields’ (2017a) work on urban struggles with financialisation, this conceptual argument is unpacked through a case study of post-crash Dublin, an urban space reshaped by housing financialisation and struggles resisting it. Housing has been a key subject of contention in post-crash Dublin and activists’ digital/material struggles illustrate how digital technologies and platforms can be and are appropriated to resist housing financialisation. The paper traces the intertwining of housing financialisation, resistance, and the digital in post-crash Dublin and argues that future research on platform real estate, urbanism, and automated landlord practices must take seriously the ambivalent opportunities, agency, and counter narratives that housing activists create through their digital/material practices.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1537-1554 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Housing Studies |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Jul 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
UCC Futures
- Collective Social Futures
Keywords
- automated landlord
- digital technologies
- financialisation
- geography
- Housing activism
- platform real estate
- urban geography
- urban studies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Digital/material housing financialisation and activism in post-crash Dublin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver