TY - JOUR
T1 - Diphtheria toxoid dissolving microneedle vaccination
T2 - Adjuvant screening and effect of repeated-fractional dose administration
AU - Leone, M.
AU - Romeijn, S.
AU - Du, G.
AU - Le Dévédec, S. E.
AU - Vrieling, H.
AU - O'Mahony, C.
AU - Bouwstra, J. A.
AU - Kersten, G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2020/4/30
Y1 - 2020/4/30
N2 - In this study the effect of repeated-fractional intradermal administration of diphtheria toxoid (DT) compared to a single administration in the presence or absence of adjuvants formulated in dissolving microneedles (dMNs) was investigated. Based on an adjuvant screening with a hollow microneedle (hMN) system, poly(I:C) and gibbsite, a nanoparticulate aluminum salt, were selected for further studies: they were co-encapsulated with DT in dMNs with either a full or fractional DT-adjuvant dose. Sharp dMNs were prepared regardless the composition and were capable to penetrate the skin, dissolve within 20 min and deposit the intended antigen-adjuvant dose, which remained in the skin for at least 5 h. Dermal immunization with hMN in repeated-fractional dosing (RFrD) resulted in a higher immune response than a single-full dose (SFD) administration. Vaccination by dMNs led overall to higher responses than hMN but did not show an enhanced response after RFrD compared to a SFD administration. Co-encapsulation of the adjuvant in dMNs did not increase the immune response further. Immunization by dMNs without adjuvant gave a comparable response to subcutaneously injected DT-AlPO4 in a 15 times higher dose of DT, as well as subcutaneous injected DT-poly(I:C) in a similar DT dose. Summarizing, adjuvant-free dMNs showed to be a promising delivery tool for vaccination performed in SFD administration.
AB - In this study the effect of repeated-fractional intradermal administration of diphtheria toxoid (DT) compared to a single administration in the presence or absence of adjuvants formulated in dissolving microneedles (dMNs) was investigated. Based on an adjuvant screening with a hollow microneedle (hMN) system, poly(I:C) and gibbsite, a nanoparticulate aluminum salt, were selected for further studies: they were co-encapsulated with DT in dMNs with either a full or fractional DT-adjuvant dose. Sharp dMNs were prepared regardless the composition and were capable to penetrate the skin, dissolve within 20 min and deposit the intended antigen-adjuvant dose, which remained in the skin for at least 5 h. Dermal immunization with hMN in repeated-fractional dosing (RFrD) resulted in a higher immune response than a single-full dose (SFD) administration. Vaccination by dMNs led overall to higher responses than hMN but did not show an enhanced response after RFrD compared to a SFD administration. Co-encapsulation of the adjuvant in dMNs did not increase the immune response further. Immunization by dMNs without adjuvant gave a comparable response to subcutaneously injected DT-AlPO4 in a 15 times higher dose of DT, as well as subcutaneous injected DT-poly(I:C) in a similar DT dose. Summarizing, adjuvant-free dMNs showed to be a promising delivery tool for vaccination performed in SFD administration.
KW - Aluminum-based adjuvants
KW - Diphtheria toxoid
KW - Dissolving microneedles
KW - Intradermal immunization
KW - Microneedles
KW - Repeated-fractional vaccine delivery
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85081668432
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119182
DO - 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119182
M3 - Article
C2 - 32119899
AN - SCOPUS:85081668432
SN - 0378-5173
VL - 580
JO - International Journal of Pharmaceutics
JF - International Journal of Pharmaceutics
M1 - 119182
ER -