Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

EAACI guidelines: Anaphylaxis (2021 update)

  • European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Food Allergy, Anaphylaxis Guidelines Group
  • Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • University of Southampton
  • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
  • Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
  • University of Copenhagen
  • National University of Singapore
  • The Evidence Centre
  • IRCCS Ospedale pediatrico Bambino Gesù - Roma
  • European Society for Emergency Medicine
  • Wayne State University
  • Université de Rennes
  • Association for Teacher Education in Europe
  • Marche Polytechnic University
  • Ospedali Riuniti Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Foggia
  • University of Southern Denmark
  • Technical University of Munich
  • Complutense University
  • Great North Children's Hospital
  • Newcastle University
  • University of Groningen
  • Anaphylaxis UK
  • AEPNAA Spanish Association for People with Food and Latex Allergy
  • Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
  • Isle of Wight NHS Trust

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Anaphylaxis is a clinical emergency which all healthcare professionals need to be able to recognize and manage. The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Anaphylaxis multidisciplinary Task Force has updated the 2014 guideline. The guideline was developed using the AGREE II framework and the GRADE approach. The evidence was systematically reviewed and recommendations were created by weighing up benefits and harms. The guideline was peer-reviewed by external experts and reviewed in a public consultation. The use of clinical criteria to identify anaphylaxis is suggested with blood sampling for the later measurement of tryptase. The prompt use of intramuscular adrenaline as first-line management is recommended with the availability of adrenaline autoinjectors to patients in the community. Pharmacokinetic data should be provided for adrenaline autoinjector devices. Structured, comprehensive training for people at risk of anaphylaxis is recommended. Simulation training and visual prompts for healthcare professionals are suggested to improve the management of anaphylaxis. It is suggested that school policies reflect anaphylaxis guidelines. The evidence for the management of anaphylaxis remains mostly at a very low level. There is an urgent need to prioritize clinical trials with the potential to improve the management of patients at risk of anaphylaxis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)357-377
Number of pages21
JournalAllergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume77
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'EAACI guidelines: Anaphylaxis (2021 update)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this