Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effect of a proficiency-based progression simulation programme on clinical communication for the deteriorating patient: A randomised controlled trial

  • Dorothy Breen
  • , Sinead O'Brien
  • , Nora McCarthy
  • , Anthony Gallagher
  • , Nuala Walshe
  • University College Cork
  • Ulster University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a proficiency-based progression (PBP) training approach to clinical communication in the context of a clinically deteriorating patient. Design: This is a randomised controlled trial with three parallel arms. Setting: This study was conducted in a university in Ireland. Participants: This study included 45 third year nursing and 45 final year medical undergraduates scheduled to undertake interdisciplinary National Early Warning Score (NEWS) training over a 3-day period in September 2016. Interventions: Participants were prospectively randomised to one of three groups before undertaking a performance assessment of the ISBAR (Identification, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) communication tool relevant to a deteriorating patient in a high-fidelity simulation facility. The groups were as follows: (i) E, the Irish Health Service national NEWS e-learning programme only; (ii) E+S, the national e-learning programme plus standard simulation; and (iii) E+PBP, the national e-learning programme plus PBP simulation. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the proportion in each group reaching a predefined proficiency benchmark comprising a series of predefined steps, errors and critical errors during the performance of a standardised, high-fidelity simulation assessment case which was recorded and scored by two independent blinded assessors. Results: 6.9% (2/29) of the E group and 13% (3/23) of the E+S group demonstrated proficiency in comparison to 60% (15/25) of the E+PBP group. The difference between the E and the E+S groups was not statistically significant (χ2 =0.55, 99% CI 0.63 to 0.66, p=0.63) but was significant for the difference between the E and the E+PBP groups (χ2 =22.25, CI 0.00 to 0.00, p<0.000) and between the E+S and the E+PBP groups (χ2 =11.04, CI 0.00 to 0.00, p=0.001). Conclusions: PBP is a more effective way to teach clinical communication in the context of the deteriorating patient than e-learning either alone or in combination with standard simulation.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere025992
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019

Keywords

  • assessment
  • communication
  • handover
  • performance
  • safety
  • simulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of a proficiency-based progression simulation programme on clinical communication for the deteriorating patient: A randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this