TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral group therapy in patients at risk for serious mental illness presenting with subthreshold bipolar symptoms
T2 - Results from a prespecified interim analysis of a multicenter, randomized, controlled study
AU - Leopold, Karolina
AU - Bauer, Michael
AU - Bechdolf, Andreas
AU - Correll, Christoph U.
AU - Holtmann, Martin
AU - Juckel, Georg
AU - Lambert, Martin
AU - Meyer, Thomas D.
AU - Pfeiffer, Steffi
AU - Kittel-Schneider, Sarah
AU - Reif, Andreas
AU - Stamm, Thomas J.
AU - Rottmann-Wolf, Maren
AU - Mathiebe, Josephine
AU - Kellmann, Eva L.
AU - Ritter, Philipp
AU - Krüger-Özgürdal, Seza
AU - Karow, Anne
AU - Sondergeld, Lene Marie
AU - Roessner, Veit
AU - Sauer, Cathrin
AU - Pfennig, Andrea
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Bipolar Disorders published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2020/8/1
Y1 - 2020/8/1
N2 - Objective: Most patients with bipolar disorders (BD) exhibit prodromal symptoms before a first (hypo)manic episode. Patients with clinically significant symptoms fulfilling at-risk criteria for serious mental illness (SMI) require effective and safe treatment. Cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy (CBT) has shown promising results in early stages of BD and in patients at high risk for psychosis. We aimed to investigate whether group CBT can improve symptoms and functional deficits in young patients at risk for SMI presenting with subthreshold bipolar symptoms. Method: In a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, patients at clinical risk for SMI presenting with subthreshold bipolar symptoms aged 15-30 years were randomized to 14 weeks of at-risk for BD-specific group CBT or unstructured group meetings. Primary efficacy endpoints were differences in affective symptomatology and psychosocial functioning at 14 weeks. At-risk status was defined as a combination of subthreshold bipolar symptomatology, reduction of psychosocial functioning and a family history for (schizo)affective disorders. A prespecified interim analysis was conducted at 75% of the targeted sample. Results: Of 128 screened participants, 75 were randomized to group CBT (n = 38, completers = 65.8%) vs unstructured group meetings (n = 37, completers = 78.4%). Affective symptomatology and psychosocial functioning improved significantly at week 14 (P <.001) and during 6 months (P <.001) in both groups, without significant between-group differences. Findings are limited by the interim character of the analysis, the use of not fully validated early detection interviews, a newly adapted intervention manual, and the substantial drop-outs. Conclusions: Results suggest that young patients at-risk for SMI presenting with subthreshold bipolar symptoms benefit from early group sessions. The degree of specificity and psychotherapeutic interaction needed requires clarification.
AB - Objective: Most patients with bipolar disorders (BD) exhibit prodromal symptoms before a first (hypo)manic episode. Patients with clinically significant symptoms fulfilling at-risk criteria for serious mental illness (SMI) require effective and safe treatment. Cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy (CBT) has shown promising results in early stages of BD and in patients at high risk for psychosis. We aimed to investigate whether group CBT can improve symptoms and functional deficits in young patients at risk for SMI presenting with subthreshold bipolar symptoms. Method: In a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, patients at clinical risk for SMI presenting with subthreshold bipolar symptoms aged 15-30 years were randomized to 14 weeks of at-risk for BD-specific group CBT or unstructured group meetings. Primary efficacy endpoints were differences in affective symptomatology and psychosocial functioning at 14 weeks. At-risk status was defined as a combination of subthreshold bipolar symptomatology, reduction of psychosocial functioning and a family history for (schizo)affective disorders. A prespecified interim analysis was conducted at 75% of the targeted sample. Results: Of 128 screened participants, 75 were randomized to group CBT (n = 38, completers = 65.8%) vs unstructured group meetings (n = 37, completers = 78.4%). Affective symptomatology and psychosocial functioning improved significantly at week 14 (P <.001) and during 6 months (P <.001) in both groups, without significant between-group differences. Findings are limited by the interim character of the analysis, the use of not fully validated early detection interviews, a newly adapted intervention manual, and the substantial drop-outs. Conclusions: Results suggest that young patients at-risk for SMI presenting with subthreshold bipolar symptoms benefit from early group sessions. The degree of specificity and psychotherapeutic interaction needed requires clarification.
KW - at-risk
KW - bipolar disorder
KW - CBT
KW - early intervention
KW - group treatment
KW - prodromal
KW - serious mental illness
KW - subthreshold bipolar
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85081745869
U2 - 10.1111/bdi.12894
DO - 10.1111/bdi.12894
M3 - Article
C2 - 32112496
AN - SCOPUS:85081745869
SN - 1398-5647
VL - 22
SP - 517
EP - 529
JO - Bipolar Disorders
JF - Bipolar Disorders
IS - 5
ER -