TY - JOUR
T1 - Engaging children and families in pediatric Health Research
T2 - A scoping review
AU - Flynn, Rachel
AU - Walton, Sarah
AU - Scott, Shannon D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s).
PY - 2019/11/4
Y1 - 2019/11/4
N2 - Aim: Patient engagement (PE) in pediatric health services research is challenging due to contextual factors such as busyness of parenting, work schedules, and diverse family structures. This scoping review seeks to comprehensively map current PE strategies with parents and families across existing published pediatric health research literature. Methods: We followed Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and Levac et al., (2010) six-stage scoping review process. We conducted the search strategy in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Psychinfo databases. Data were extracted from included articles; evidence tables were developed and narrative synthesis was completed. Results: Of 3925 retrieved records, seventeen articles were included in the review. Patient engagement primarily occurred through strategies such as advisory groups, meetings, focus groups and interviews. Strategies were used to engage patients at various levels, for different purposes (e.g., to inform, participate, consult, involve collaborate and/or lead). These strategies were also used at various stages of the research process. Navigating power differences, time and money were commonly reported challenges. Inconsistent terminology plagued (e.g., stakeholder engagement, consumer participation, patient and public involvement, participatory research) this body of literature and clarity is urgently needed. Conclusions: This review offers insights into current PE strategies used in pediatric health services research and offers insight for researchers considering employing PE in the future.
AB - Aim: Patient engagement (PE) in pediatric health services research is challenging due to contextual factors such as busyness of parenting, work schedules, and diverse family structures. This scoping review seeks to comprehensively map current PE strategies with parents and families across existing published pediatric health research literature. Methods: We followed Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and Levac et al., (2010) six-stage scoping review process. We conducted the search strategy in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Psychinfo databases. Data were extracted from included articles; evidence tables were developed and narrative synthesis was completed. Results: Of 3925 retrieved records, seventeen articles were included in the review. Patient engagement primarily occurred through strategies such as advisory groups, meetings, focus groups and interviews. Strategies were used to engage patients at various levels, for different purposes (e.g., to inform, participate, consult, involve collaborate and/or lead). These strategies were also used at various stages of the research process. Navigating power differences, time and money were commonly reported challenges. Inconsistent terminology plagued (e.g., stakeholder engagement, consumer participation, patient and public involvement, participatory research) this body of literature and clarity is urgently needed. Conclusions: This review offers insights into current PE strategies used in pediatric health services research and offers insight for researchers considering employing PE in the future.
KW - Health services research
KW - Patient engagement
KW - Pediatric
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85074683465
U2 - 10.1186/s40900-019-0168-9
DO - 10.1186/s40900-019-0168-9
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85074683465
SN - 2056-7529
VL - 5
JO - Research Involvement and Engagement
JF - Research Involvement and Engagement
IS - 1
M1 - 32
ER -