Abstract
This study investigates how different cost matrix formulations influence cost-sensitive tree extraction method performance within the post-hoc model-agnostic XAI framework. As an input parameter, the cost matrix is essential in building cost-sensitive tree models. The initial, default version of the cost matrix is defined to reflect the class imbalance ratio among each pair of classes. Here, two different formulations of the alternative cost matrix are proposed: centroid distance-based and medoid distance-based cost matrix. The cost-sensitive tree method with different formulations of cost-matrix is compared against other tree-based and rule-based XAI methods as a surrogate model for the underlying black-box model. Evaluation metrics are employed to assess the generated explanations, and results demonstrate that rule sets extracted from cost-sensitive trees are smaller with shorter rules on average across different datasets with varying number of classes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 129-136 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | CEUR Workshop Proceedings |
| Volume | 4017 |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | Joint of the xAI 2025 Late-Breaking Work, Demos and Doctoral Consortium, LB/D/DC@xAI 2025 - Istanbul, Turkey Duration: 9 Jul 2025 → 11 Jul 2025 |
Keywords
- Cost-sensitive decision tree
- Explainable artificial intelligence
- Interpretability
- Machine Learning
- Model-agnostic explanations
- Rule extraction
- Rule-based systems
- Surrogate modeling
- Tree-based methods